".glb file specification" gets that as its first hit on Google, too. OP was just being incredibly lazy and ironically was expecting the search engine to figure out what she wanted without telling it explicitly.
FaceDeer
joined 2 years ago
Over an hour into the video. Not going to be seen by anyone who doesn't already buy in to the headline.
Ironically, I just asked an AI to tell me what the video's justification for the title was.
The speaker clarifies that they are using the terms "parasite" and "cancer" in a precise way to describe generative AI. ● Generative AI is parasitic because it relies on human communication and creativity for training data but simultaneously erodes and destroys those very things. The speaker compares it to a parasite that drains resources from its host without offering any benefits in return. ● Generative AI is cancerous because it spreads rapidly, replacing authentic human content with AI-generated content, and dealing with it will likely be difficult and have unintended consequences. The speaker acknowledges that addressing this problem, much like chemotherapy for cancer, might inadvertently harm "healthy cells" as well.
The speaker chose this title to emphasize their serious concerns about the negative impact of generative AI on human creativity, communication, and the internet. They believe generative AI is harmful because it deceives users by presenting AI-generated content as human-created. The speaker clarifies their word choice to preempt potential criticism and ensure their message is understood.
I just wish they were interesting NPCs.
The approval process for who, individual users or instances as a whole? How do you enforce that in a decentralized system?
The paradigm that you're asking for is not a sustainable way to run a country of 300 million plus people.
Again, I am not asking for this paradigm. I'm describing what the paradigm currently is.
Congress has the power to delegate specific policy decisions to said agencies.
Evidently not. Saying "but they should have that power" isn't going to get net neutrality actually implemented. Because they don't, as evidenced by the fact that they got shut down when they tried.
Canadian journalist Luke LeBrun unfairly banned from r/Canada for asking why his article was removed
This may get a federal investigation going, though.
Thanks, it was very useful to know that.
If you wanted the specification why not search for ".glb format specification"? I did that on Google and the specification was the first hit.
I'm not making any statements here about what's "right" or "good", I'm just saying what is. The US government is operating in ways not intended by the constitution. At least not clearly intended. If you want to interpret that as me taking a position then it would be that they should fix their constitution. Until they do that then their government will be unstable and unpredictable.
It's only "polluted" if you're looking for something specific and you refuse to ask for something specific.
If you go into a restaurant and ask them for "a drink" without specifying what drink you want, don't complain about the quality of the coffee when they bring you a coke.