ExtantHuman

joined 4 months ago
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Just someone who understands what words mean.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn't think the governor of Florida is talking to Californians

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'm not sure how to dumb this down any more for you ...

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Are you trying to describe an ETF/mutual fund?

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It's not speculative...

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (9 children)

They don't. But being the squeaky wheel in one party in a two party system where the other party is hellbent on blocking anything their opposition wants, regardless of what it is, gives you a lot of leverage.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I hate how so many evil companies are taking their names from nerd culture. There's also a weapons manufacturer named Anduril

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I await the pathetic DeWine photoshoot where he declares everything fine and healthy, and then in 6 months we are oh so surprised by the soil being extreme carcigenic.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Except it IS the case...they just did it with extra steps to skirt a law forbidding this very thing.

Because they're scum. Trash headline

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Jacobin once again completely misunderstand what it is talking about. A stable coin is not a speculative asset. These are meant to be pegged to the currency they represent (USD, here). This is explicitly talking about the issue of the stable coin, not the holding entity. Why would these banks be issuing their own versions of stable coins, when there's already a bunch of them out there?

This has nothing to do with people gambling on memecoins

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

So... Anyone with a 401k/IRA

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The court didn't even include the court's reasoning.

view more: ‹ prev next ›