ExtantHuman

joined 4 months ago
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You just have to demonstrate something happened

A case went to and won in the Supreme Court despite this not even being met. The wedding website designer that had never made a website but sued to not have to be forced to make a gay wedding website. Based on the potential future scene that had never occurred.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

The fuck he didn't.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

We haven't NOT been energy independent for like a decade and a half.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, you clearly didn't understand what women were saying with the bear thing - they know what to expect when seeing a bear, a man could be anything - good guy, bad guy, or a bad guy that pretends to be a good guy initially before turning on them. They voted for the known quantity. The overwhelming majority were not saying all men were the bad guy, (and I'm sure you can find an example of someone saying anything somewhere).

And the right wing pushed that misinterpretation because it made young men angry and bitter and more likely to vote Republican as revenge or whatever

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

That didn't actually happen, and it's the right wing that pushed the narrative that it had specifically to get you to remove your support.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Don't make him likable!

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

That's the bath salts talking

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

He's never been seen driving even once in decades. Who gives a shit

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So he wants to be overthrown, likely drawn and quartered from the inevitable revolt when no one but the billionaires have any money? Weird fetish

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 62 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's almost like putting the guy who famously, thoughtlessly fired way too many important people when he took over Twitter... In charge of doing the same thing to illegally fire people from government agencies was a bad idea.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Breaking contract law does not currently seem to be in the oligarchs' interests at this point.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Sadly, I cannot narrow it down further. I mostly see it written out rather than hear it spoken. And it's always a generalized Midwest area.

I just find it to be a particularly grating phrase, so it stands out.

view more: ‹ prev next ›