ExLisper

joined 2 years ago
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 8 points 2 years ago

I'm sure you agree to pass any "rights" to your DNA when you sign the T&C.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The data is annonimized.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sharing with whom? No one will watch it. Definitely no one will search for it. If you want to share video with your friends just send them a message. They will see it and it will be deleted after a week. This makes way more sense than hosting it on a platform indefinitely.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What are you using lisp for?

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 6 points 2 years ago

It's very American to struggle greatly and fail to solve issues other countries don't have.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 2 years ago

Where I live there was a subsidy for EV when getting rid of your old car. I'm getting 7k back but my old car was worth maybe 1k so that's 6k off the price of the EV making it the same price as ICE version. In many other places there are different subsidies like this, it's worth checking it out. This helps a lot with the upfront cost.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 177 points 2 years ago (16 children)

To anyone using Chrome and complaining about Google having too much control: shut the fuck up. You're part of the problem.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

, video hosting is extremely expensive

Here's a solution: make people pay for having their videos hosted. Video hosting is expensive because YT has to host petabytes of shit, useless content. And I don't mean 150 versions of 'I will survive' on ukulele. I mean completely useless videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4bLDaQAle6c

Why is YT spending money on hosting this? It should be simple: you want your content hosted? Hosting individual videos would not be that expensive. You want to share couple of videos with friends? Pay $1 per month. Serious creators (with a lot of content) could still get money from ads placed in their videos but THEY should be getting the revenue, not YT. YT would get % of it back in form of the hosting fee. I would simply be a way better model.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 4 points 2 years ago

I mean... this story is exactly why. Which part of it didn't you understand?

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 8 points 2 years ago

10/10 meme.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ok, but neural networks can process way more examples per second so 'faster' is not really the right term here.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 39 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Can't. 2nd amendment. You have to give him more guns. Also give a gun to the 6yo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›