You're talking about a basic GP visit. The standard/expected practice is to prescribe 'best guess' medication and see if it improves. As you said you can get the equally bad treatment from a tired/sick doctor as from one who 'despises' you. It's just a common risk everyone accepts so you're comments about not wanting doctors who despise you treating you makes little sense. You can tell the doctor isn't very good and go to another one. Where it could be important is a hospital visit and there are procedures to follow there. Doctor can't just give you a sick note and send you home. If he does that's malpractice.
ExLisper
joined 2 years ago
but most likely it complicates things and/or takes too long.
It's not very complicated but it does take too long: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435736
It took them 10 years to resolve this request.
You would get warnings from the browser, plugins removing those certs and versions of browsers without them (EU version and non-EU version). I
I think you watch to much TV. That's not how medicine works. How do you imagine it? I go to a doctor with migraine and he starts thinking real hard what could be the cause? And if he 'despises' me he just doesn't think as hard?
There are procedures doctors have to follow. If they fail to follow the procedures it's malpractice. The procedures are the same for all doctors. There's no 'look, I did the bare minimum, you can't punish me'. Either you did what was required or you didn't. Each time a doctor would mistreat someone on purpose because he 'despises' them they would open themselves for investigation and a court case. That doesn't mean there are no shitty doctor making mistakes, they would just have to be really dumb to do it in purpose.
Jesus, this is not about spaying. This is because browsers have history of sucking at trusting new certificate authorities.
In Spain you get private certificate on your ID. You can use this ID to sing documents and access government pages. Those certificates are signed and provided by the government institution responsible for printing money (Royal Mint). It took them like 10 years to get the root cert added to the main browsers so that people could authenticate using those certs on government pages. It still doesn't work very well and I have to manually trust certs on Linux. I think I don't have to explain why being able to identify yourself on govt pages would be great.
What's the security risk here? People really think that the Spanish spy agency would request certs signed by the Royal Mint for 3rd party domain and use those for MITM attack? When they are caught this would raise huuuuge stink, Spanish govt certs would get banned and Royal Mint would lose all credibility. I'm not saying they are definitely not stupid enough to try it but they would only be able to do it once.
In Poland you just tell them there's no more vodka.
They need to do what Europe did and teach people that quality of life is about work-life balance and good public services, not about grinding and buying cheap shit in big quantities. People will not start cooking their meals because of warning labels. They will start cooking when they have enough time and money for it.
So where you live doctors just let people suffer/die if they don't like them and it's ok? You don't have any oversight, expert panels, ethics boards, investigations? That's wild.
Ok, so let's hope that the supreme court agrees with you and draws the line at taxi drivers. Because today they let photographers discriminate you and tomorrow they can decide that the rules for doctors are unconstitutional.
Cool but where do you draw the line? If a taxi driver refuses to drive you is it still fine? What if a teacher refuses to teach your children? Or if a doctor refuses to treat you?
No, you only should be using Wayland if you need some of it's features. If you don't need mixed refresh rate/mixed scaling you're fine using X.