They are threatening to fix a problem no other civilised country has? How about actually fixing it? Right, that would be "doing something", kryptonite of every american politician.
ExLisper
joined 2 years ago
Tone police? I simply don't see the point of discussing politics with childish people. I'm simply calm. You're unable to express anything without profanities and insults. But yeah, I will do the grown up thing and simply block you.
No, not really, Most people can simply talk about their different opinions. You act like a child.
Had a issue with my zero just recently (motherboard battery run out), I posted on their forum and had a replay in a matter of hours with a link to disassembly video. I talked to them in Spanish but from what I see they reply in English without issues.
Like during Obama's two first years? Forgot about that? Yes, it was some time ago but all the problems were already there and Democrats chose to pussy foot around looking for weak, bi-partisan deals instead of addressing them. That they did very little even when they had full control was exactly why people didn't go out to vote for Hilary. It's not that Democrats can't do anything because they don't have full control. They don't have full control exactly because they don't do anything.
They probably have nothing interesting to say anyway. After a year or two all the scientists will be like "I fucking know you like krill, whale. Shut the fuck up about the krill already".
US actively supports Israeli genocide of Palestinians.
Is 9-11 some Canadian 7-11?
He wishes there was such an easy fix for two planes flying into skyscrapers.
Spanish government taxed extra profits by banks and energy companies right at the beginning of all this and inflation went quickly down. This was obvious from the beginning, most politicians simply pretended it's not.
Yes and no. Yes, normally you do have a series of institutions overseeing different parts of the government and making sure it acts within the laws but in USA this system is simply broken. In normal countries constitution is the ultimate guarantee and the judiciary 'check's if laws are in accordance with it. The judiciary functions as a independent branch with judges being selected by other judges to the most important roles. In USA supreme court judges are directly selected by the president which totally invalidates the entire system. At the same time, in every other country, it's assumed that party with the majority in the parliament simply has the mandate to govern and (surprise) does govern. They use this majority to do reforms and pass laws. In USA not only the system is designed in a way that does not let the party with majority support actually control the government (electoral college, the senate, election cycle), they also came up with fictional mechanisms to further weaken the ruling party (filibuster). As a result the 'checks and balances' make sure that no true reforms are possible while weakening the judicial oversight and constitutional rights. Worst system you could think of.