installed a Windows update, (...) and I have Google Chrome set as my default browser
It's subtle but if you look closely and read between the lines you can see what the real issue is.
ExLisper
joined 2 years ago
I’m not even sure what people will use it for
Bragging?
Documents that every other president released voluntarily...
And the inseminated cows goes "o fuck, I'm late again! I can't go thought this again. my career will go to shit".
It is meant to be used for something like you and three people rob a bank and one of your crew shoots a guard.
It's worse than that. You can be charged with murder for borrowing a car to those three, even if you didn't took part in the robbery.
85% after 2.5 years is not good. My car battery has guarante of 80% capacity after 6 years. 20% of range is a significant difference so I take car of my battery and don't charge it above 80% if not needed. It's the same with laptops. Current models can easily last 5-10 years but having only 50% of capacity after that time would be a problem. Sure, if you're intending to throw it out after 3 years it doesn't really matter but if you want to use it for as long as possible you definitely should take care of the battery. It's pretty much the only part that degrades (except maybe keyboard).
A private prison health care company accused of substandard care is awarded new contract in Illinois
I guess they didn't watch John Oliver episode about it.
Where is it a preferred method? I think it's approved in one country but is it actually preferred or recommended by doctors anywhere?
I just meant is a normal human reaction (I even said it would be immoral. Did you see that?). I understand that people like to see this as some sort or 'justice'. You keep telling Brits that it's a bad decision and it would hurt them and then voilà, they suffer the consequences. It just feels good to be right but of course if you think about it a little you realize it's a overall terrible thing and feel bad for all the misled people.
Brexit showed us that situation like this the 'bigger person' in the conflict will try not to starve millions of people to death and will not simply cut them off. We as individualise would surely like to see Brits/Texans suffer all the consequences but politicians are usually more pragmatic than this and have to think long term. Turning Texas into 3rd world country wouldn't do any good to anyone. Blocking supplies as some sort of collective punishment would simply be immoral.
Of course they are not going to secede but if they did they would still get all the supplies they need. Their economy would suffer greatly but they would just blame US and keep going.
Come on, how can this be bad if it made some people a lot of money?
Credit?