Grossman
What a fitting name. Because he is quite gross
EndlessNightmare
joined 1 year ago
Less and less each day
and America funding it.
And absolutely gaslighting anyone who calls anyone out for it.
I'm really sick of the whole "criticism of Israel is antisemitism" rhetoric. NO IT ISN'T. And pushing this rhetoric harder isn't going to make me support them either. If anything, I'm going to see it as an increasing threat to my First Amendment right to free speech.
My criticism of the Chinese government is not hateful towards the Chinese Americans in my community. It's also not hateful towards the Chinese people living in China or anywhere else in the world. It's a criticism of the leadership, which is fair game. Ditto for criticism of Iran, Russia, or any other nation I can think of.
But criticize the Israeli government and suddenly it's a problem. There's less pushback for criticizing the U.S. government!
No, but as I said plenty of experts and scholars are calling it one. I believe the ICJ said that it is "plausible," which I taken to mean that it is inconclusive. Consider that this was many months ago before the more recent escalations.
For my own part, I'm neither an expert nor do I have enough reliable, unbiased information to make any sort of assertion on the topic. Reasonably, I can only defer to the experts and try to filter out sources that have a vested interested (in either direction). There are experts saying both yes and no, so it really comes down to who you trust.
This definitely seems like one of those "enemy of my enemy is a friend" sort of deals
Similarly, it isn't not a genocide just because the perpetrators say it isn't.
Many experts and scholars do make the claim that this is genocide, and frankly a significant section of the world that doesn't have a direct vested interest (i.e. not involved) seems to be of the opinion that it is.
That may be true, but bloodthirsty lunatics without the numbers to back them up lose much of their effectiveness.
that’s by design.
See also: automobiles. Automobiles and smartphones certainly have strong cases for how utilitarian they are. They are both genuinely very useful.
But the expectation that everyone has one, along with them becoming practically a requirement for most people, has turned them into a dependency and a means of control. Some people can manage to forgo them, but you almost have to build your life around doing so.
The smartphone has effectively turned into a leash.
I absolutely do not trust that an "off" phone is actually off, unless the battery is removed (assuming it can be).
See: John Fetterman
I think he catches a lot of flack for his attire
United: "Fly the friendly skies"