Well obviously the 2nd Ave Subway for starters.
DrunkEngineer
I mean it's a good project, but not even close to being the most impactful NYC transit project in modern history.
There is tons of stats at data.bts.gov, BLS, and Federal reserve FRED system. Image above is from https://data.bts.gov/stories/s/Transportation-Economic-Trends-Transportation-Spen/ida7-k95k/
Basically, what we find is that wealthier people have bigger carbon footprint. They drive more miles, own more and bigger cars. They also fly more miles. What you are calling "degrees of obligation" is nothing more than a lifestyle choice. The suburbanite driving 50 miles a day in a BMW SUV is the one being impacted here, not the low-income worker taking the bus or driving an old Corolla.
Also note that driving is highly subsidized, and if the gas tax isn't raised to cover those costs then that money still has to come from somewhere. And that somewhere is other government programs, which low-income are much more highly dependent on.
The greatest trick ever pulled by oil industry PR was to convince leftists that the gas tax is regressive.
400kg makes a huge difference. Road damage increases proportional to the fourth power of axle load, which is like 2x in your example.
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, the CO2 gasoline equivalent for coal-generated EV is just 29mpg; i.e. no better than a decent ICE.
The grant was from a program called Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant Program. The program was probably canceled by Trump because it had the word Equity in it.
Moving away from fossil fuels is a good thing.
That depends on where the electricity comes from. Instead of ‘EV’ we should really be calling these things Natural Gas cars.
Trump should focus on Ohio instead:
Wow, that headline is extremely misleading. The homeowner got fined by her HOA not for the door, but because she modified plumbing going into other units without approval or inspections.