Doug

joined 2 years ago
[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

For sure. It's frustrating when people get your name wrong and enough of that can make it bothersome when you know other names are being said wrong.

Thanks for being open to correction!

[–] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Doug@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

radical left

🤙

[–] Doug@midwest.social 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Women breaking out of previously accepted societal norms were seducing (guys? boys? men?) into sexy parties that probably weren't risque enough for late night skinemax but too far for PBS.

Pearls were clutched

[–] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago

I don't disagree. I think if it's an issue the users have the power to resolve it

[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Right, which is why I put the line after that in

[–] Doug@midwest.social 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I don't get it either. Defederation is a tool just like banning or spam prevention. If it's unused it's pointless to have.

But you don't ban everyone for a single offense just like to don't defederate lightly. If you do then people will move elsewhere and the problem resolves itself

[–] Doug@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

That'd be it, yeah

[–] Doug@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's why I put the extra bit at the end. I think FOSS is or is becoming synonymous with open source.

FOSF isn't terribly pronounceable, but would technically be a thing too.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Technically speaking shouldn't this be FOSH?

I know the term has taken hold and is more googlable. Just pedantically speaking.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

I've heard accounts both ways. I'm not quite old enough to have seen it new, but I've known people who said it was fantastic and people who said it was never better than it is now.

Shrug

[–] Doug@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

It's slow with bad pacing. There's are things that are obviously supposed to look impressive but even if they ever did (for which there's disagreement between the nerds old enough to remember) it absolutely did not age well. Those are the obvious ones off the top of my head without having watched it in a few years.

I guess I'll have to give this HD director's cut a shot but I'm pretty skeptical.

view more: ‹ prev next ›