DokPsy

joined 2 years ago
[–] DokPsy 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Funny enough, it's not the engineers that are doing it. Left to their own devices without ridiculous constraints like "someone else is doing it this way so we need you to do something that sets us apart" or "you can't look at what everyone else is doing", engineers will do it the laziest way they can..... By copying what others are doing and essentially making it standard.

[–] DokPsy 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I see your point but I counter with Neil Gaiman.

[–] DokPsy 21 points 2 years ago

That's messed up. Where?

[–] DokPsy 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tasha Yar spilled the beans in ten forward before her untimely demise, apparently.

[–] DokPsy 7 points 2 years ago (26 children)

This is exactly why they're attacking. Humans fucking up their environment.

[–] DokPsy 11 points 2 years ago

I'm not one to actively encourage increases in military spending but if it's to outfit the orcas, I'm all for it

[–] DokPsy 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The S in IoT stands for security

[–] DokPsy 2 points 2 years ago

I'd expect nothing less, honestly

[–] DokPsy 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's what's so sneaky about it. It's genius, honestly

[–] DokPsy 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's either a very dedicated imposter or the real deal which would mean Margot Robbie is a giant nerd. I choose the latter option but would not be surprised by the former.

[–] DokPsy 1 points 2 years ago

Saw the pics and it honestly looks like over extrusion, especially that top surface

[–] DokPsy 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

You basically have to retune your profiles to match between the petg and the larger nozzle.

Recommend following this as well as you can: https://ellis3dp.com/Print-Tuning-Guide/

Oh yeah, and you're going to lose detail with the larger nozzle compared to a 0.4 but it's a trade-off

view more: ‹ prev next ›