Dojan

joined 4 months ago
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is such a big reason why LGBTQ+ representation is so important. They love to say that we're "shoving it down their throats" and whatever, but it's not for them. It's for us, and those of us who don't yet know that they're one of us. People live with varying degrees of suffering, feeling like something is missing, or wrong, and have no idea what that missing piece is. Then at some point they encounter something, and finally they find that missing piece and it changes their lives.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

She was the founding director of Women's Forum Australia, [...]  It also promotes a trans-exclusionary ideology and campaigns against transgender rights.

Right so assuming she's not Lesbian, then her being anti-LGBTQ+ is a safe bet. If she somehow is Lesbian, she's going to be anti-BTQ+ at the very least.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They're covering their arses, which is a good call. I wouldn't put it above the big corporations to use the fact that their models are trained on stolen data and then engage in spurious lawsuits against small projects and companies for infringing on their copyrights. That might be their best bet once this AI BS dies down.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 9 points 5 days ago

This is how I feel. I’m not really okay with the money I pay getting used to develop ML and crypto BS.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I bumped into copyparty the other month when looking for a software that could let me transfer files to a friend with the ability to pause/resume. Didn't bother with it, tried another software instead. Never really got it to work so I gave up on it.

Bumped into the YouTube video today, decided to give copyparty a shot, damn sir you've written a fine piece of software. It's so easy to get up and configure. The UI is a bit janky, but charming at the same time. Thanks for all the hard work!

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I dont think you understand how many mentally unstable people out there are using LLMs as therapists.

I do understand. I know there are people out there thinking that LLMs are literally Jesus returning. But in that case, write about that.

There are a lot more reasonable critiques of LLMs, and the companies to be had.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Haha. I remember booting up my work PC and there being a copilot button in the browser. Clicked it out of curiosity and it transformed my well-written text into incoherent garbage. It literally made up new words.

Wonder if it’s because of stuff like this. Probably not, but I hope.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

Don’t assume evil when stupidity

I didn't, though? I think that perhaps you missed the "I don’t think necessarily that people who perpetuate this problem are doing so out of malice" part.

Scream racism all you want but you’re cheapening the meaning of the word and you’re not doing anyone a favor.

I didn't invent this term.

Darker patches on darker skin are harder to detect, just as facial features in the dark, on dark skin are garder to detect because there is literally less light to work with

Computers don't see things the way we do. That's why steganography can be imperceptible to the human eye, and why adversarial examples work when the differences cannot be seen by humans.

If a model is struggling at doing its job it's because the data is bad, be it the input data, or the training data. Historically one significant contributor has been that the datasets aren't particularly diverse, and white men end up as the default. It's why all the "AI" companies popped in "ethnically ambiguous" and other words into their prompts to coax their image generators into generating people that weren't white, and subsequently why these image generators gave us ethnically ambigaus memes and German nazi soldiers that were black.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, absolutely. There are no good options for a truly libre web, unfortunately. :(

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think it's a compounding issue, primarily of Google products just kind of being the "default."

Google pays to be the primary search engine in Firefox, on iOS, and sets themselves as the default on their operating systems. They, wherever possible also set their browser as default. Yes, Chromium is open source, but they have the ultimate final say, and no one seems to have the interest in forking it. This puts Google in a similar position that Microsoft was in in the 90s and early 00s, where they can essentially hijack the web and force their ideas through whether others want to or not.

We saw this with Google forcing Manifest v3, all Chromium-based browsers essentially just had to follow suit. That was just Manifest v3 however, who's to say what else they'll do?

Then there's my tinfoil hat worry that Google essentially being the window to the web for so many people, on an OS, browser, and discoverability level is just overall a cause for worry. That's not even considering their communications and media platforms.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Just don't use Chromium unless you for some reason absolutely have to. Mozilla is just another corporation, but they're not exactly threatening to monopolise the internet. Google is, and using Chromium directly aids in their effort to do so.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I swapped over to Proton in my degoogling process sometime in April last year. Not thrilled about their crypto/AI/Trumpy BS since.

view more: next ›