do donations need to be truthful in plain terms of how the funds are used ?
I think in 2023 parlance the claim is probably plain enough to be "truthful".
Giving gold supports the contributors you love
It's pretty well established that receiving gold on reddit is perks like... a gold star or something, rather than actual real gold.
I've been catch and release for 5 years or so now.
Archiving is such a huge drain on time / effort / resources.
Would a timeline really provide much benefit over viewing screenshots in a folder?
This one has a calendar:
https://m.majorgeeks.com/files/details/auto_screen_capture.html
That's not how polling works
Not really.
Cancel all mygov accounts that are using secret questions as 2 factor auth. Job done.
Most of the "scammers" are peoples junkie kids. I shit you not.
They can't / won't do that though because then you can't blame old / poor people for being old / poor and not being able to access services.
Auto cookie delete isn't really necessary since total cookie protection.
For me, I often get to Friday afternoon and realise I haven't recorded my time all week.
Supposed to be billing clients for tasks.
Screen caps every 15 minutes helps me see what I was doing
Sharex auto capture?
Tax agent here.
I've seen a bunch of tax payers fall victim to this. It's not sophisticated. Just answer people's secret questions to access their mygov accounts. That's it.
Thereafter it's trivial to request changes to a tax return that will generate a refund of $20k, whatever really.
It would be trivial for the ATO to intercept. A highschool student could write a database query to reveal the fraudulent changes.
Yeah this thread is a bit silly.
I hate oversized US wank tanks, but anyone can see just from the cover image that this isn't a factory product. As you said, it's sold as the cab & chassis. The tub and lift (and a bunch of other things) are custom.
That said, I completely agree that the US has lost it's fucking mind, but if we're going to make that assertion lets build it on something real.
The only way to answer this question is to investigate the circumstances of specific examples.
Generally, the person just doesn't have the money. If Giuliani bought his nephew $100m in shares 10 years ago, who's to say those shares do not in fact belong to the nephew.