Diva

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago

They're at pretty much every meeting, if so much as a speed bump comes up it's vetoed

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Assumption? I attend these traffic commission meetings lol

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I would call you a pedant but that would also get me banned as rule 1 violation.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (14 children)

I was being a shit to you cause you were giving me 1 word responses, but the rule 1 in c/news is for posts, not comments otherwise all your comments would have also been rule 1 violation, like what?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (16 children)

I've literally never submitted a post to the sub, just comments so far.

Like find in the modlog where I submitted a post to news@lemmmy.world, I just scroll and reply cause I'm a shithead

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (18 children)

I didn't post anything there, so seems like some draconian mod action then.

Also I was mostly ribbing you at the time cause you were giving me low effort responses like "that's ironic" without addressing anything I was saying

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (20 children)

You're clearly not a bot, and if I said you were I would prob get banned for a rule 1 violation. I'll be patiently waiting to see if any of the people who've been misgendering me catch a ban, but I won't hold my breath.

America has a democracy, it's not really great at representing people, but I get to fill out some paper every year. It also has unlimited money for oligarchs to influence elections. That money can come from pretty much anywhere. See the analogy?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (37 children)

It can be a democracy and also silly. Are you trying to say American elections don't allow for unlimited money to be spent on elections as "free speech"?

There was a famous court case where the supreme court said it was ok.

view more: ‹ prev next ›