Dimpships

joined 2 years ago
[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yeah, have you?

areweanticheatyet.com

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And NFT's are the receipts.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago

Then do us a favour and pay up.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Appeasement doesn't work with an opponent incapable of concession.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Offensive vs Defensive. Think in terms of physical violence. Attacking someone else without legitimate provocation is offensive, ergo intolerant. Attacking someone who is attacking you is defensive, thus remains tolerant.

Pick any scenario and you can fit it into that construct with adequate context and nuance, there's two sides to every coin, you just need to look close enough to see which side is up.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Their problems are self inflicted, there's a difference.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago

Hate with your head, not with your hands,
otherwise you'll be picking from commissary plans.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

They should still be obligated to record and pass on the details of the crime, and get the citizen in contact with the correct people directly. Recording and reporting crime and inter-police communication is kinda their whole fucken job.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Self defense isn't oppression.

[–] Dimpships@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

@Rivalarrival@infosec.pub, got caught up on two simple questions and lost their composure.