TypeScript's readonly is compile-time only and has zero runtime cost
This point means that I'll probably never use the good ideas in this post: if I'm doing JS complicated enough to need Object.freeze(), I'll be doing it in Typescript.
TypeScript's readonly is compile-time only and has zero runtime cost
This point means that I'll probably never use the good ideas in this post: if I'm doing JS complicated enough to need Object.freeze(), I'll be doing it in Typescript.
the neater and more consistent your handwriting, the easier time the Nuwa pen will have captur[ing] it
That's me out then
I don't think that's the opposite of plot armour, though - O'Brien was too much a main character (and too popular) to be killed off, so we knew he'd survive the episode/danger/trauma.
He definitely broke his arm more than the rest of the cast combined, but was spared any serious injury until the plot required it.
Minus things already mentioned (and in no particular order):
I watched this the other day. Overly dramatic in parts (which I just found funny), but it's clearly well-researched and has interviews with some of the original players.
Definitely worth the 30 minutes.
It doesn't look like it, but I suppose you could write it in the config file and put the whole file in a secret (not tested, may not work)
The โindirect email flowsโ issue, i.e. forwarding and mailing lists breaking DMARC alignment, remains unsolved
Perhaps they should keep working on it, then. Easier said than done, I know...
I just went to look for answers this, since report-uri.com is killing its free tier, and the lowest paid is way higher than my usage justifies. What did you settle on?
One core was busier, but it wasn't at 100%. My Rust code yesterday was the same, perhaps it's taking too much time accessing memory.
The time was wall time (as per Starship's output) but it was still waaay too slow to bother with again!
I just ran this on a laptop - it worked (part one only) but took 4h28m21s so Nushell is not a language for AoC (or I just coded it very poorly).
That rating doesn't seem to match the rest of the review.