Decq

joined 2 years ago
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Those people probably bever gotten to opportunity to lwarn to read. These people clearly can read and could have looked it up for themselves. Besides you don't need to know what tariffs are, from the context there js only a single deduction you can make. The US population would pay for it.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

You dont need to be taught shit to figure out who would pay for it. You must be absolutely brain dead to not figure this out on your own. But yet here we are

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This so true, every one complaining that the borrow checker is annoying isn't apparently aware what they used to do was inherently flawed. Sure there a some, though rare, false positives. But they are easily mitigated. These people are exactly that what they themselves are complaining about, elitist.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still fucking obvious it's Coca-Cola

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

This is why i stopped using an ISP router.. And went eiht pfsense. Last time i tried to change a port forward my wifi went out for a whole week before they even answered. I gave u at that point. They think you're absolutely brain dead, they treat you like you're absolutely brain dead. And they themselves are absolutely brain dead. I had enough. So I've installed my own shit and i haven't had an outage since then. Surprise surprise?

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Its still stupid to trust anyone with your only copy of your important data, who can just disable your account in an instance without thinking twice about it.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And none of these magazines or whatever will ever lower their price. Major savings, but only for our shareholders!

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Could make it so it's possible to create an unique certificate for each site, though most people probably wouldn't bother

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It had such a GLaDOS vibe, so i thought it was a reference to that. I guess life really does imitate art.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Wait, does this mean the Replit case was actually real!? I was sure it was just a skit or rage bait. I didnt think anybody could be that stupid...

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Does the argument work both ways? If effort is the same as being paid for. Does that mean pirating a game is the same as buying it? After all it's basically the same effort these days.

Of course the argument doesn't fly, as you cant actually buy a game anymore, just a temporary license for an undisclosed amount of time.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's especially funny how Republicans are against regulations because according to them, it stifles progress and innovation. So why are they against regulations that try to force progress and innovation?

Of course we know why, because it's all a lie. They just want more money for the 1%. How there is even a single (non-1%'er) idiot left that votes for them is waaaay beyond me.

view more: next ›