DeckPacker

joined 5 days ago
[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Alright, I guess I was the fool for thinking I could have a productive exchange of ideas with SatansMagothyCumFart

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Of course they are, ask like any good author, actor or filmmaker. Art is an expression of the human spirit, a human using a medium to communicate some part of their inner world or of the world around them. Good movies and books are all about this.

I mean, you can pretend otherwise, there is no empirical definition of art, but I would imagine that any reasonable person would agree that movies and books are art.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

I feel like this statement can't be true. Have you never watched a good movie or rea d a good book?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I would say it's fine to pirate Harry Potter media.

So if you are really that into it, just pirate it.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with a simple piefed community?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think, that the vast majority of pieced developers is actively using piefed (or some piefed-compatible software) though, because otherwise, how would you even think of contributing to a project like that? Is not breaking some peoples habits really worth all the negative aspects of realtime chat platforms like Zulip or Matrix? I think there would be some huge upsides, if we explicitly told people on the codeberg page to post their questions to our forum instead of asking it on matrix/zulip.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, I've seen some projects use that, but I see no reason to, considering it's not FOSS and piefed is really well suited for this exact purpose.

 

So currently, we have two different closed-off developer chats on Zulip and Matrix.
This means, that new devs will be confused about which channel to join and experienced devs have to actively look around in both channels for questions to answer.
This seems like a really inefficient system, so we should at least decide on one official communication channel.

The other issue with this is the closed-off nature of these real-time chat applications. Shure, anyone can join, but answers to technical questions will inevitably get burried in unstructured long chatlogs, which no new develloper will read through. That will lead to a lot of questions being asked, that were already answered previously.

If we abandoned these channels in favor of one unified piefed community (like piefed-devellopment@piefed.social) or something, we could build a good knowledge base of answered questions, that are easy to search through and look around in and will also get indexed by search engines. This will make it easier and easier for new developers to join over time, as they will be able to look through an increasingly extensive knowledge base if they have any questions and also easily find the people, that are willing to help them.

Funnily enough, Rimou has already talked about the advantages of a forum-like communication channel for open source devellopers, so i think it's time for us to apply this to our own project.