Daxtron2

joined 2 years ago
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website -1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

There is no child being abused by a generated image or a drawing.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website -2 points 2 years ago

"Everything I don't like is a GDPR violation" lol

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And yet its being treated as though it is

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And when characters are killed on screen in movies, are those snuff films?

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

It can be abhorrent and unlikable, its still not abuse

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 0 points 2 years ago (12 children)

And an AI generated image does not show a child being abused

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (27 children)

No it isn't, not anymore than a drawing of a car is a real car, or drawings of money are real money.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Its not though, its just a drawing.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago

I'll use it at work because I don't give a fuck about that machine but not for my personal machine.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

I can barely remember to feed and water myself, predators are drawn to my curvy boyish figure. Chickens would be screwed.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah and he should go to jail for grooming a kid but to try and pin csam creation charges on him is wrong, regardless of the US' fucked up laws.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Agreed, just wanted to point out that controlled burns are good and not as bad as uncontrolled ones :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›