Shit that's interesting. What's the context? What were those edits?
Daxter101
joined 2 years ago
The political blockading 5 years ago was sobering news.
This is watching a really, really, really big train crash, after knowing for minutes that the driver was accelerating on purpose.
This was predicted and expected.
Wanted to share, because it worked for me
A "truly small" creator, would get , I dunno, let's say 5% of Disney's marketed sales, after being stolen from, from being known as the guy Disney stole from. Which would be enormously more than if he only had his "truly small" marketing.
A more successful and known creator, who would market himself more broadly on his own, would not be easy to steal from, since it would be quick enough for the stealing to be found out, to dampen Disney sales.
And all this, ignores the paradigm shift in monetisation (Uniquenameosaurus YouTube video), that could enhance this process immensely, and allow artist creativity to flourish even more, without even leaving the diseased economical rules of capitalism.
and irrelevant little aside
Also about this,
As opposed to now where the original artist/author at least has some recourse against the big corporation. Versus none.
Guns give some recourse to poor people, against the rich, because anyone could use a gun.
Guns allow the rich to equip their personal security teams, with guns.
Guns are not helping the poor, and neither does copyright.
Holy shit it do
Yeah. It's a big, painful, complicated, disgusting problem, where law enforcement is a jackhammer, and the crime is a malfunctioning pocketwatch.
In my opinion, in order to make the situation equally unfair and dangerous for everybody, the law should be unfair and straight up just be biased in favour of the party in most statistical danger and least control (the penetrated party).
But that's the "best we can do, given an impossible situation" kind of solution, because the real solution is to deal with society's problems that cause the situation. Preventative rather than reparative treatment. Giving people what they need to be well, rather than depriving and punishing them as much as possible to keep them obedient.
And that goes against what our society is built around 🙃
I'm with you, 100%.
But the meme shows someone hearing someone else prepping, and themselves getting a hard on.
The only cishet explanation for this, does not include men's fun button. (Not that women's anal is any less fun, to be fair)
Ah shit, that is one boss well-versed in internet culture. Will do though
Inserting just enough water into the anus and expelling it, repeatedly (usually flushing in between), in order to clean it from poop.
For sex/masturbation reasons.
Ah, shoulda gone with my first instinct, I don't know why I expected anything cishet from this community lol
I'm about 101% sure it's possible, +-1.1%
Yep, this is the feeling