Daxter101

joined 2 years ago
[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not very knowledgeable on all this, but, the best method is to one day get laser.

That's probably not within your reach if you're asking so, let me say, from my experience with really visible, high contrast and dense body hair, any method of uprooting (plucking or waxing), both gives a pretty good result of hairlessness if you get all of them, and, after 2-3 cycles of growing and uprooting again, that hair is permanently 10-15% less visible (primarily thinner, also straighter). If you know where to look, my arm hair has a transition line between the side I plucked, and the side I haven't yet. It's unassuming, but still there, after plucking them 3 times, more than 4 months ago.

The disadvantage of that is that you need to let them grow a bit, in order to have something to grab on to.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I see. Well, if I take what you're saying as fully correct, then it sounds like communism compared to anarchism, is just "a different path for how we reach the same utopia".

And this different path passes through more authority (quantity and quality), through the existence and emphasis of the state.

How much authority, is probably what makes the spectrum of Anarchy to Stalin-Lenin.

And well... As an anarchist, deafboy's comment might be polemic, but I get it. Any authority that can, will get corrupted.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Why not both tho

And Freddie clearly agreed with the sentiment too

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Your astroturfing reads so strongly like sarcasm I almost upvoted.

I honestly thought "There's no way anyone, paid or brainwashed, would post such a thing and mean it".

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What makes this thing you're describing, not anarchism?

I think you're thinking of anarchocommunism specifically. Which is "not all communism"(tm).

State-based communism is a thing, that many people usually called tankies by others, do believe in.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm assuming they meant "talking to the parent, using less complicated, more mainstream words, even if the meaning is a little wrong as a result".

Which in my opinion is an ok approach, even though this specific parent, just by posting here, appears tech- and lgbt- savvy enough to probably know at least some terms.

~~Also, they could have just said 'not trans' instead, if 'cis' would be too advanced.~~

Actually scratch that, I get using "straight" as non-lgbt. It is how is very commonly used outside of lgbt circles.

But not a bad thought on its own. ~~just maybe a bit othering.~~

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

I mean... Understandable. I get it.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, nearly all of them do, tbh. Especially the last one.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The breeding kink option

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

uBlock Origin -Iceberg edition-

view more: ‹ prev next ›