Darkassassin07

joined 2 years ago
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Deleted my comment.

After looking into it more; there is access inside, but it's typically secured with a pressure differential and several locks.

They'd only really access it if absolutely required; for example to fight a fire in the cargo hold.

Bathroom would have been a good solution. Or just move her to a back seat and move the living passengers away. Bizarre they forced a couple to sit beside her.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Should check which ports.

Mine blocks 80 inbound and 25 outbound, but everything else I've tried works. (so no default http, and no outbound email)

I only really want 443 for simplicity, everything else can be random ports.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Public IPV4 here. It's not static, but very rarely rotates. DDNS ftw.

Telus Residential in Canada.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Tell that to Ketamine Karen.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It would make sense; she denied it to herself until she physically couldn't anymore, then panicked not knowing what to do with/about it and chucked the newborn.

Given she's American; accepting you're pregnant at 15 knowing you'll probably be forced to keep it (or at least birth it)... That's tough.

I'd expect more of this unfortunately; given Americas renewed fight against abortion, contraception, and sex related health information in general.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

DoH on the lan between devices is completely pointless; I'm talking about DoH between the lan and external dns which unbound does NOT do.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Bear saber; the latest starwars backwoods hunting game.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's hard to get exercise when you're hiding in the oval office, using your kids as a bullet proof blanket.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 37 points 6 months ago

Given Musks new role in the Federal Government, that may no longer be true.

Musk censoring public discussion (either personally, or done at his direction) may amount to First Amendment violations, given he's now a government representative (though they're trying to argue he isn't).

Is modifying an AI to refuse to provide information on him, considered censoring public speech? Probably not; but he's not 'free to do whatever he likes'.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago

Honestly; pretty clever for a teen. Well done.

view more: ‹ prev next ›