Darkassassin07

joined 2 years ago
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You were banned for stating a users mother should be/was raped, in response to this comment:

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

makes a post fishing for opinions on a dispute

receive a valid opinion

I don't care what you think, your opinion means absolutely nothing.

"I'M NOT THE PROBLEM, EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG EXCEPT FOR ME"

I'm glad lemmy has robust blocking features. Enjoy your pointless scream into the void.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

They'll be landing at a US base, so you can't outright reject the flight; have them met at the gate and refuse to allow them off the base into Greenland. Don't even send anyone beyond a low level soldier or patrol officer too, just to snub them.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Seize the device and crack it with tools like Cellebrite. Possibly with you in custody in the meantime.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

My point is; the purpose of biometric unlock is convenience, especially since it doesn't disable pin/pass. If you can't use it in most situations, you may as well just use a pin/password. You gain absolutely nothing by setting up your penis to unlock your device...

With relation to border inspections: you get ordered to unlock devices for border security to inspect. If you refuse, you'll either be refused entry and turned away or you'll be detained until access is gained (willfully or through cracking tools). The US has demonstrated much more willingness to detain people at the border and hold them for months without charge, so I wouldn't push it. To be clear; your 'rights' against unlawful search and seizure do not apply at the border, even for US citizens.

Don't store anything you don't want border security to see on a device you're bringing through a border checkpoint. Store it on a remote server and retrieve it as necessary.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Somehow I think whipping my cock out to unlock my phone will be frowned upon in most situations...

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

Sentry mode records to local storage. It's pretty difficult to recover data from a pile of ashes.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 58 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ha! Can't insure it, can't drive it on public roads. That's even better than jacked up rates.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 99 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Mark did an interview with Philip Defranco and posted raw footage showing/explaining that Autopilot turned itself off instead of hitting the brakes.

They also did two takes, it did the same thing both times. The first time, they just used a poster instead of a full foam wall. They decided to add the foam for a better visual once they realized it would just happily plow through it.

Finally there's some argument of Autopilot vs FSD; but both rely on the same cameras and should have at least tried to brake. The LIDAR car braked and it was just using emergency braking, no self driving at all.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 72 points 5 months ago (5 children)

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47042

It would seem Insurance does actually cover acts of terrorism as long as they exceed $5million in damages, the amount Tesla has conveniently been claiming at each of their locations; with such claims partially or even fully subsidized by the federal government.

view more: ‹ prev next ›