Danterious

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah I totally agree. I'm trying my best to integrate these things into my life today.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Someone else on this thread mentioned parallel structures and that is probably what is going to be needed.

Side topic, how did you get your username to do that?

Edit: It was @Cowbee@lemmy.ml

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but that doesn't get rid of the fact that the information it self is still easily reproducible. What you are saying is that there still needs to be effort in curating information, but you aren't saying that there is a cost of reproducing information.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that we do live in a society where information is not scarce because the ease of replicating any information has increased significantly.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah my mistake. I'm gonna fix the title.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (38 children)

I specifically said we are in a post-scarcity information society. I didn't say everything is post-scarcity.

@wikibot@lemmy.world

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

It seems like he removed the ad read from the video. So I'm guessing he was taking the criticism to heart.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Interesting take. Could you elaborate?

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah quite a few of his videos feel like that.

The content is good but then comes the ad read being read with the same enthusiasm as the video which just makes the video feel insincere.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ok thx I'll take a look. Also what do you think revolutionary action would look like then?

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

limiting our use of capitalist infrastructure when we can but ultimately our society is constructed in a way that forces us to engage in consumption.

Yeah it does force us to engage but any action taken doesn't have to be a be all end all.

For example the trend of De-Googling your web experience isn't done all at once. It usually is just replacing google services with other options over time.

The same can be done with capitalism. Find other ways you can get what you need and replace capitalism with that other method.

Edit:

No amount of subversion will allow us to separate the proletariat from the bourgeois class; they will not allow us to not consume.

That is a little defeatist. Even though it seems like you still advocate for revolutionary action it seems like you think the bourgeois class is infallible which just seems to be wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›