Yeah agreed. The character building in that was good.
The license is a copyleft license and I'm doing it because saw someone else doing it, thought it was a neat message (specifically the anti commercial part), and then added it to my comments.
The link should show what it covers.
Full context for anyone that wants it:
https://beehaw.org/comment/4197620
I don't think your representation of the situation is fair.
Lemmy is basically a failure IMHO.
Reddit is mostly a superior experience for users
If you really think this and don't think Lemmy will get better then you should be using Reddit instead of Lemmy.
This is one of the coolest things that I've seen done with mushrooms.
if you have a ‘liberal space’ and some conservative attempts to bring fascist ideas to the table, they are not flat out rejected. they are admonished for the facts inherent in fascism.
In the process of doing that admonishing you are inherently changing the kinds of conversations that happen in that space.
Sometimes it okay to take some positions for granted so you can have deeper conversations about specific ideas and that only happens when there is agreement about certain facts.
Constant disagreement paralyzes action and is the same tactic that people use to sterilize social movements.
That is actually pretty close to how I was thinking about it. I'm just wondering if there is a balance to it all that we can find. Like if existing necessarily causes harm how much of that is necessary and how much of it is exploitation.
I mean the closest philosophical position that I've seen in relation to it is peter singer's position but that seems exclusive to human-human relations (Edit 3: apparently also animal liberation).
Edit: Also if I was to focus on invasive species again currently we say that because something is an invasive species we should kill or stop them because they are causing damage to the existing ecosystem. Which makes sense to me it is reducing the diversity and possibilities for that space but on an individual level you would be saying that oh your existence is harming other creatures in the area so we need to kill you to make space for others which seems somewhat inhumane?
So the question sort of translates to what level of focus are you judging the value of something at?
Edit 2: Another thing I have against peter singer's position is that it's too utilitarian
Brazil is setting up a lot of regional cooperation. All of that under a roughly leftist democratic stance. Given the resources they have, they are in a pretty good place.
Huh good for them then. I wish them the best.
This is a really good idea and one of the most important things we could do before he takes office. Edit: (Even if you aren't in the United States)
Something that had sad moments and I think is often overlooked is Gene of AI. It is more of a philosophical anthology series though rather than a show that builds up characters to hit you with emotional baggage.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~