DahGangalang

joined 2 years ago
[–] DahGangalang 1 points 1 year ago

I would warn about your improper grammar, but I doubt you'd care.

[–] DahGangalang 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Perhaps harvesting the guano is where the Wayne family wealth truly comes from.

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 1 year ago

Very compact and efficient with your facilities (at least compared to my typical build) while maintaining a lot of room to expand.

You don't look to be hurting for electricity, but to help with solar flares and heat waves, I like to place two walls with a 1 tile gap between them surrounding on 3 sides of my coolers. I'll then drop a passive cooler in that air gap (assuming I have the wood to spare to keep them fueled). It tends to let the coolers cycle between low/high a bit (saving electricity) and it can really help when the bad times come.

Good luck out there!

[–] DahGangalang 97 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I now want a community dedicated to....uh....dresses that....uh.....yeild that appearance.

Maybe something like c/MozzarellaBags?

[–] DahGangalang 3 points 1 year ago

Thats a good point.

I expect the courts would uphold that flavor of argument too (at least in the U.S.; I expect the same in other countries, but don't feel comfortable speaking for systems I'm not at all familiar with).

[–] DahGangalang 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar on my end.

The main CU I work with will let you verify logons inside their mobile app when logging on from like a desktop (text/call only for mobile logins), but the high yield savings I have at a much larger name bank is text only for 2FA (Which is not a mandatory nor default setting BTW).

What's everyone's opinions on verifying logins via mobile apps?

[–] DahGangalang 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I bet its the cheapest and/or easiest to implement. Why do more than the bare minimum, amirite?

^I feel like mine is a bad faith opinion, but I also feel passionately about this and want to ensure your post is getting some level of engagement so it can maybe get some proper discussion going.

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, okay, I def do avoid hexbear, so I can see how I'd miss their contributions to this all.

I knew the instance was full of tankies, but thats interesting to hear that they have (had?) a sexism problem. Just to be clear, it was the "stereotypical" sexism (that is: men hating on women; not hate towards men and/or the LGBT population), right?

[–] DahGangalang 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

while also having a penchant for sexism and odd racism.

I literally haven't seen any of this. Can you provide some examples?

I def see the leftist leanings, but Lemmy as a whole seems super progressive on those topics. You're not the first person I've heard say this though, and I'm wondering if in just missing it by sticking to popular posts and top level comments. Am I missing something big here?

[–] DahGangalang 15 points 1 year ago

I def like this notion, but would really only want it for posts and top level comments.

I would greatly appreciate if this were implemented modularly (that is: in such a way that we could toggle the kinds of content that are filtered based on account age, so as to allow me to ignore posts and top level comments, but so other could also disable each of those as they see fit).

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does not appear to work on Android :,(

[–] DahGangalang 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Had a convo about this with a pair of (very white) people from Texas. They unironically called themselves Tejanos.

Not sure how widespread that preference is among Texas people.

view more: ‹ prev next ›