Ah, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.
Wow, that's a pretty discussing comment. You do not agree with a few peoples views, do generalise and want them to die. You're worse than tankies.
Edit: my memory failed me. Wrong guy.
Isn't he the pro-Russia dude that got overthrown? If so, this kind if reeks of self-promotion.
Bashing govt, so what, he can win and hand Ukraine back to Russia?
Lol, I hit the nail on the head it seems.
Ah, a classic Luddite ad hominem. Show's how weak your argument is.
So for you, this isn't about climate, but animals? Are you an environmentalist or a vegan using climate to push vegan goals?
No, in that case, you're digging up carbon in trees, lighting it and putting it in the sky...
But that carbon wouldn't be in the air otherwise, so not good. Reduce, reuse, recycle.
Creepy how folk shill for more control by man over nature and our ecosystems. That has been so great for the planet.
To generate organic material will still take significant energy and materials, probably not much less than standard practice unless you're looking at corporate funded research.
This feels like hijacking climate with a trojan horse for GM tech. "Now you like and eat your lab grown meat, how about, better yield, less disease. Let's just flick these switches and change it. Oh BTW, this tech is proven and great to generate organs and flawless offspring". Corpate entities gonna do everything to extract profit and do not care about the implications.
No, no and no.
Nah, it's quite big and well known in open source circles.
You do you, though.
Screw the environment. More CO2 please.
Yes, and you do it at the point you need to work on that feature. The business pay for it when they want the change.
You do not pay for the refactor with your time, if the company won't pay to fix their code. Just make it clear the risks and how bad it could be if you carry on with duct tape fixes.
You have to be strong and firm and not agree to hacks. You need to work with your team to ensure you're on the same page rather than getting undermined by cowboy dev claiming he can do the feature in 2 days when it needs 2 weeks to do the necessary work.
Ah, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.