CrypticCoffee

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not American. I don't know much about the history of the body, who runs it or whether leadership changes under different administrations. I also do not know the scientists and whether they are completely state funded or there is industry funding anywhere (on this, or on previous or future research papers). I'm asking questions. I looked at the paper and usually it has a section on conflicts of interest, even to state that none exist. I couldn't see that section on this paper.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

So first cutting airline emissions increases global warming and now cutting ship emissions does it?

It's like someone is trying to get a message out that cutting emissions is bad for the planet. Are we being gaslighted? Is this industry FUD?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago (11 children)

What are you stating cannot be turned off?

This sounds baseless without any evidence.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

The weirdo think is quite light. Harris has a lead because the media have been talking about her rather than Trump. Why change what is working?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't think she needs to go down to his level. They should be responding to her, not the other way around. She should focus on policy and what will be good with her as president.

He wants attention. It is his oxygen. Do not give him it.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (13 children)

And it can be turned off.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the bargaining stage of the five stages of grief.

Maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Firefox works for nearly everything. The only stuff that doesn't work for me is Xitter embeds, and this is a gift that keeps on giving.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So for a little bit until people stop caring.

Firefox is the correct play here.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For now. They could default to yahoo and make money. Maybe not as much, but they could sustain browser development.

Firefox is still far superior to chromium.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (15 children)

I prefer flawed but trying guys to guys with zero morals that farm every ounce of data they can.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

First one is about Germany, not UK. Secondly, you do realise wikipedia is unreliable, prone to edit wars and subject to those that have the most passion for a topic (like free speech "absolutists"/racists). It's why academia tell you its a poor reference and to not bother.

Can you find a UK example that you think overstepped the line?

I'm in the UK, critical of Israel and not been arrested yet...

It's always interesting seeing distrorted American views of the UK.

view more: ‹ prev next ›