CriticalResist8

joined 6 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

their dollars lol

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My mistake, I can see now your liberalism is terminal. The only thing we can do is pull the plug. But before I do, allow me this one pleasure:

Freedom of movement is a human right. You know that, right?

Source?

Uhhh I was referencing Soviet occupied countries like Poland, East Germany, Hungary, Czechia, etc.

Source?

Cult leader, no democracy, public executions

Source?

I am safe near you right now because I agree with you

Source?

Religion plays a major role in people’s identities

Source?

Sure, tax the churches. Do all that. However, if someone wants to practice their religion, let them be.

Source?

Is it not for free media that criticizes the government?

Source?

Do economically protectionist policies justify suppressing an individuals right to free information/education?

Source?

I can have e2ee conversations with my friends via Signal

Source?

Can a Chinese individual say “Fuck the CCP and Jinping the Pooh” on Signal? No, cuz Signal (an open sourced application) is banned in China.

Source?

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 2 years ago

I'll remember to volunteer you for the frontlines of the nuclear armageddon war!

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I didn't say that

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I fail to see how you managed to do that. I did not learn anything new about socialism.

That's your problem. Do you see me coming into your house to pee in the plants and break your plates? Frankly we've been very patient with you. And I personally still intend to be. But patience in this case does not mean I also have to be polite.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

United Nations Security Council 2397. Read it.

There's that, but also they are technically still at war with each other (North and South). South Koreans fleeing towards the North have been shot at by their side.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I do not have to idolize former or present socialist governments to be a socialist.

Nobody said that. But you have to educate yourself. Otherwise you're just a poser.

And you haven't educated yourself. This is what we are doing, all of us, here right now. We're trying to educate you on socialism.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It don't mean you have to uncritically swallow state department propaganda either but here we are. You seem like the kind of socialist who wants free healthcare built on the backs of immigrant workers but don't care when your country bombs hospitals in Pakistan or Syria.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Most of western Europe, Canada and even parts of the US to a certain degree are as progressive as one may get in terms of queer rights, both legally and socially.

Yeah, 80 years later. Compared to a country that has not existed for over 30 years lol. Google what Biden, Hillary or Obama thought of gay and trans rights in the 1990s.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

The Berlin Wall

Preventing brain drain and smugglers. Prices were fixed in the East and smugglers would buy on the cheap in the East and sell for a profit in the West. Berlin should have never been divided in two in the first place, this was proposed by the the western powers to have a foothold for counter-revolutionary activity. It was their ploy, and their ludicrous plans. https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Anti-Fascist_Protection_Rampart

Holodomor

see this page https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Holodomor and the one linked at the top there as well.

Freedom of speech

Freedom of speech is a recent asinine invention. Did they have freedom of speech during the Terror? No, because you need to control propaganda and counter-revolutionary activity. You could protest for tons of things in the USSR btw, but you couldn't protest to call for the dissolution of the socialist system. Pretty reasonable.

Afghanistan

The legitimate government of Afghanistan asked the USSR for help against the Mujahideen funded by the CIA. The goal of the US was to draw the USSR in a long proxy war, putting Afghans at risk, to drain their military resources. https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Soviet_intervention_in_Afghanistan

If you want to go there the US was the one who had no reason to be there, once again meddling into another country's affairs. They also committed the Highway of Death massacre. I don't get why you care so much about what a country that has not existed for 30 years did some 50 years ago when you have a very much alive and very much barbaric country doing worse right now.

Eastern Europe hates USSR

They don't. I don't know where you get your news but you should look for another source.

The countries that see more benefit than harm were the countries that were mostly left out. A developing country will have unequal development so this isn't surprising. Turkmenistan represented 3 million inhabitants out of almost 300 million. You also have to take into account where these countries came from before the revolution but I digress.

North Korea

Why are you refusing to talk about them? Go ahead. Talk about them. I know what you're gonna say. You're gonna say the exact same thing your "progressive" media of choice is saying about the DPRK. What your school says about the DPRK. What TV says about the DPRK. Things we've heard hundreds of times before that we used to believe too (I hope you don't think we used to live under a rock before we emerged as communists) until we actually started reading source material about the DPRK and realized it's actually not at all like the media says it is.

state atheism

who cares seriously. Plenty of people don't live in secular countries but they themselves are atheists or non-practicing and they don't whine half as much as you do about it. We have communists on this platform living in officially Muslim countries like Indonesia or Iran and they don't give a shit about it. Seems like the most random thing to complain about. Just reeks of western privilege. Do you think people in Tsarist Russia had a choice to be atheist? How do you think that would fare for you when the Field Marshal came by your village to investigate potential revolutionary activities and he, as a faithful Orthodox Christian, learned you hadn't been in church for a month or more. Get some perspective.

Great firewall

So that they could develop their own tech solutions. I don't see what's so difficult about it. Oh, the horror, China does not have access to shitty braindead tiktoks, we need to bring them freedom in the form of ICBMs! Seriously, who gives a shit. Have you asked the Chinese what they think of the firewall? They don't care. They love their local tech solutions, their own social media, and the laws surrounding it. They get a VPN if they want to see whatever the fuck racist crackers are saying about them and COVID-19 conspiracy theories. And then they realize, damn we have it good in China.

I can’t do good if I ignore the atrocities committed by the people “on my team”.

So instead of "ignoring the atrocities on your team" (in your words), you just go straight for state department propaganda. But I don't think anyone here is under any illusions you're on our team.

You seem somewhat reasonable, so I hope you can realize these two things: - you can't bring up anything we haven't heard before and - everything you were taught about communism is wrong; we don't love Stalin for killing Ukrainians, we simply have evidence to show that it did not happen like you believe it did. These are two very different things.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

If you get 25 upvotes I'll do it

 

We see a lot of account requests from people who are just yet dipping their toes in marxism and communism. We can't abandon new comrades to the flow of the current they are floating in, pulling them in all directions without a reason or goal in sight. They need a comprehensive, actual study plan.

I purposely limited myself to 6 books (honorable mentions would have been State and Revolution and the Manifesto) as this is like a crash course to get you to an adequate level. If you read say a chapter every night (and for principles of communism just do it in one go it's super short), you should finish everything in around a month.

This thread should also double as an ask your questions thread. But I feel there's also a whole thing around asking questions; people want to know about the war in Ukraine, about US imperialism, about what's happening in China or the DPRK... but while this is important, it's parallel to your marxist studies. You must, alongside current events, learn about the fundamentals as well. Sometimes it seems less important because there's major stuff happening and "theory" is seen as some dead wood, something you can pick up but was written a century ago and so has little relevance to our world today, but it's the opposite. If you truly want to understand what's happening today, you have to understand not only what happened in the past that led to today, but also the theory that was written down in the past and is still applicable.

So anyway, feel free to ask for clarification on stuff you don't understand, not focusing solely on current events as I often see around the grad 🙆‍♀️

 

Edit 1: Wisconcom finally found the file, and has DM'd me on Discord! He joined the archive server we set up of his "Committee" and found my name from there. But he failed to realise one thing -- it was all a facade!

  1. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/803508721383899146/1129346283325358110/Screenshot_20230714_113703_com.discord_edit_708705141816628.jpg

  2. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/803508721383899146/1129346283614777364/Screenshot_20230714_113716_edit_708720428790008.jpg


Since November* 2022, ProleWiki has been the victim of a very dedicated stalker and harasser.

ProleWiki has been maintaining this document since February of 2023, when Wisconcom was ramping up his attacks and harassment against us.

When he left us alone briefly in May-June 2023, we agreed we would not publish it so as not to ruin his reputation. It was always an equivalent exchange: if you stop bothering us, we'll leave you alone.

He didn't though, he came back in July as many of you are aware, and so we make good on our promise. That is one thing Wisconcom -- and all harassers that would come our way -- must realise about us.

Be prepared for a long read, but it's worth it.

I am only the humble messenger of this document.

 

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/ProleWiki:Library

Go check it out and give us your feedback!

BY THE WAY, you can help upload books to the library! We can transfer books 1:1 from Google Docs or LibreOffice to MediaWiki. That means you can get books we don't have from another source, work them in Google Docs, send me the link (or better yet join our discord so other editors can pitch in), and I can upload them to our library. Not going to open random files though, it has to be google docs lol thanks

 

Took a lot of trial and error but with some help with chatgpt, I was able to finally render the mockup.

Try it now before we push it live and give us your feedback!

 

with the way twitter is going, I don't give it much longer to live so we're diversifying our social media presence just in case.

 

Those that know me know I work a lot on prolewiki.

Online resources are a dime a dozen, and I notice they tend to focus on the beginner stuff. And in most reading lists / youtubers / communities / other repos, it all revolves around marxism 101.

It got me to ask how can we talk about the more advanced stuff on prolewiki? Learning the basics will only get you so far. There's only so many different ways and so many different people you can teach the basics to -- if they're serious about their marxist studies, people will have to look into more advanced stuff at some point, beyond the basics.

But then I started thinking, what is actually advanced marxism? Past the beginner level. Isn't the point of marxism that we make it accessible to everyone, thus making complex concepts feel basic and at anyone's reach?

Perhaps basic marxism is its three components: the philosophy, economy, and class struggle. And anything past that such as how to apply marxism yourself or theory on decolonisation, feminism, LGBT issues etc.

But making your own analyses and understanding the theory of further developments since Marx are two different things for the student of marxism.

Or perhaps it's the same three components, but in more details -- delving into the history of philosophy, learning about the class struggle in different countries and periods, learning about other economy theory?

What is advanced marxism, and how can we bring it to the people over the internet?

 

Original author Ivan Katchanovski has given explicit permission to everyone in the world to rehost and republish his paper.

We immortalised it on ProleWiki because it's a very important paper even though some of the content is a bit both sidesy. Actually we were looking at possibly writing a preface to help new comrades parse this paper, but I feel that would make it our own reedition, which is a very different thing from republishing.

 

He requested an account on the Spanish instance of prolewiki, waited 2 months to get it looked at and approved, and then promptly started wrecking like 10 pages of ProleWiki. I mean only 10 pages, no more lol.

He left this gem in his old user page:

https://en.prolewiki.org/index.php?title=Comrade:Wisconcom&oldid=50738

However, I soon cognizant of the revisionist

lmao

anyway he got his edits reverted instantly by other editors and then banned a few moments later.

Very funny guy, helped brought the community closer.

 
 

This is the only reasonable argument, but I know rabid liberals frothing at the mouth over more dead Russians don't want to see it.

Still, for those who are still reasonable in their goals and ends, and the outcome they actually want to see, there's only one solution.

The argument on the pro-UA side is that Putin has the "choice" to just up and leave Ukraine at any time. I've written before about why he doesn't -- not after all the sanctions, not after all the resources and troops committed. NATO/Europe will not say "alright you're a good sport mate, we'll drop the sanctions and pretend this whole thing never happened, deal?". There's a "warrant" out for Putin at the ICC, what makes anyone sincerely believe things can go back to where they were before for Russia?

It should hopefully be clear that the people calling for Putin to just "leave Ukraine" know they're not being reasonable. These are some of the same people who also cheer when Ukraine gets new weapons to kill more Russians with. The goal for this segment is not peace, it's actually to prolong the war.

I'm addressing the reasonable side, however, who might have been inadvertently taken in by this psyop. I mean, isn't it weird how NAFO suddenly popped up everywhere and got media coverage? After they're doing the exact same thing as the Lithuanian elves (because elves fight against orcs) did back in 2014, and it turned out the "elves" were NATO?

Saying Putin can just leave Ukraine is impotent rage. Yeah, sure, I'm just gonna give him a quick call. He really cares what some westerners think about his war, especially now that he has to contend against NATO intervention. I'm sure we can totally convince him he's being a total nerd if we just yell about it on Twitter.

So if you actually want peace, what's the reasonable solution?

Organise locally, petition your government to stop sending money and weapons to Ukraine. Organise and protest for a peace deal. I know it's probably not what you want to hear.

But these weapons prolong the war. Just earlier today I saw a video of an APC full of 8+ Ukrainians get obliterated by a missile strike. Where did they get that APC do you think?

Do you want Ukrainians to stop dying? Me too. The most pragmatic way, the only one towards which we can actually do something, is to protest against our governments sending equipment that prolong this war.

Otherwise you have to realise this war is going to be fought to the last Ukrainian. Do you really think it's weakening Russia in any lasting capacity? The fighting is happening in Ukraine. Ukraine has been losing population consistently since 1990 (a whole fifth of it lost, mostly, to emigration). What exactly is weakening in Russia? It's Ukraine that's being destroyed and will need to be rebuilt. It's Ukraine that's losing their population by the thousands. It's Ukraine that's shooting depleted uranium bullets on their own soil.

What you're advocating for, when you advocate to prolong this war, is to kill every last Ukrainian and turn their country into a wasteland. The UA army is even using depleted uranium bullets now (courtesy of US and UK), which have polluted the land when they were used in Iraq. This is backed up by data, right? Depleted uranium has data behind it, it's not speculation.

The reason the war is being prolonged is because it makes a lot of money to the military-industrial complex. It makes a lot of money to corporations due to the inflation. A blackrock affiliate said on hidden camera recently that when Russia blows up a grain silo, the price of wheat goes up. War is a great business opportunity, always has been. And then when Ukraine will need to be rebuilt, it'll make Blackrock a lot more money.

But I'm not sure who they will rebuild the country for if there's no one else left to live in Ukraine.

My solution is the only one that makes sense. Any other is purely impotent and just venting frustrations, not effecting any actual change.

view more: ‹ prev next ›