Crikeste

joined 2 years ago
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know Arturo, he was there to support the protests. He was NOT going to do a mass shooting, as he has taken his gun to at least one other protest with no incident.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

The media is the 4th branch, they won’t report on these things until they have to. And even then, they’ll find a way to delegitimize.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And trans people aren’t treated as equal and they are constantly attacked by their fellow citizens.

Oh wait that’s America.

I don’t know much about Iran, but do they have legalized slavery? Because America does.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’m trying to understand your point, but I’m a little lost here.

Do you mean the way the public reacted to their ad?

Or the way they capitulated to that reaction?

I mean: Yes racism and sexism are pervasive in our society, but using Ben and Jerry’s (operating under the same racism/sexism) as an example; they do heavy marketing tactics toward LGBTQ but they are also an ally.

Does them utilizing that make them bad?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can something be good and also a marketing tactic?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Even if this is true, I don’t think they’re going to find the number of votes to change any outcome. Didn’t Trump win by like 3 million votes? Maybe this could have flipped an electoral college vote, but would that have even mattered?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mentioned people organizing and fighting back in my earlier comment. I absolutely support it. But the main point is the organization.

And I really don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that, while sure they are doing whatever the fuck they want now, they have far more gross tools they can use. I think what we’re seeing right now is Trump trying to normalize the military protecting ICE.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Would you consider ICE losing being -1 officers and you in prison or dead? Like I said, I don’t disagree with the sentiment, I’m just being realistic.

Let me put it this way: If people start killing ICE officers, they will be rolling up with every resource they have to kidnap whoever they are looking for.

Is that a better situation?

Killing officers is not the end, it’s the beginning.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sadly, no. I mean, MAYBE, with the right administration you could get away with killing an officer if they are breaking the law and endangering your life. But it’s really up to the courts, and courts are usually not okay with killing their officers. Even when it is justified or self defense. The state will not go down without a fight.

I don’t think there is any realistic resistance without an organized army of civilian soldiers. The 2nd amendment and ‘militias’ and all that.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

If they are using the data that has been perpetuating this for a while now, they don’t have a single source for the percentage given.

It does say NEW STUDY though, so I could be wrong.

I recently watched a YouTube video about this exact percentage, I’ll try to find it and link it.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

It’s just a stupid joke, like waking up dead.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (28 children)

Only if you want to spend the rest of your life dead or in prison.

It’s a lovely thought, but ICE has the entire weight of the government behind them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›