That's the part that gets me. If it were just not removing content, well, I'd probably still complain but they'd have a coherent freedom of speech argument. But... they have to pay Nazis to make Nazi content and take a cut, otherwise it's censorship and that somehow helps the Nazis?
CrayonMaster
I had a dm who would tell us to roll. And then say "you fail" before hearing the number
I mean it worked in Wyoming didn't it?
Well, you're commenting on a Mastodon post...
I think these are great rules, so long as they never have any teeth.
I mean, they're doable, but they're cultural goals, not technical ones.
I'd argue that really all of these are on a spectrum between the two though.
Good, that's what women want too
I think the main complaint isn't a quality question, it's that most people here don't trust Meta to act in good faith. There's a sense that they'll come in, make the fedivirse as dependent as possible, then pull out. Defederating on principle is more of an independence thing.
I agree with you for the quality thing, I rarely see mastodon here, there's no reason to think we'll be flooded with threads.
I love how most of the replies are from people not on this server. I mean, I agree, we should defederate, but still.
Imo this is firm "you can get away with it exactly once" territory. It's clever, so it should be rewarded. But after the once every lord will mysteriously have anti-shape shifting wards.
Agree with the first half, but unless I'm misunderstanding the type of AI being used, it really shouldn't make a difference how logically soud they are? It cares more about vibes and rhetoric then logic, besides I guess using words consistently
Where did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?