Why? You keep trying to dodge that your central point is that people should stop saying Nazis are bad, because the US exists. It's absurd and nothing more needs to be said, you aren't willing to engage in fair or meaningful convo
Cowbee
Yep, fucking terrifying.
On an individual level, this is possible. At an aggregate? No.
When one becomes a Nazi, they cease to be able to be considered good.
Those aren't the only alternatives, lmao. Do you think humans stop innovating if they share tools and democratize production, rather than having a bunch of unaccountable mini-dictators?
Do you think the Capitalists are the ones who innovate, or is it the Engineers and Scientists that do?
I'll make it simple for you: Nazis are bad.
That's why I said "unsurprisingly," and considering South Korea has developed far more recently, it's also important to recognize that their social progress is behind much of other developed countries. I wasn't implying that Korea has anything specific about them that made them especially misogynistic, rather, it's pointing at their current conditions and trajectories.
It's all strange. What's the point? "Hmmm, you think Nazis are bad? Have you considered that other countries are bad but significantly less bad? Checkmate!" It's just terminally online.
Imagine getting mad at someone saying Nazis are bad. I wouldn't be caught dead getting upset that someone was saying Nazis are bad, lmao
Trust me bro, Capitalism is necessary for innovation, just trust me bro
In theory, yes, though the number of shares required to go against the Chaebol is just not feasible. There's a reason South Korea specifically has a word for a specific group of Billionaire Capitalists, they are essentially untouchable.
Nazis are evil. Simple.