I see this as "if I'm going to get the death penalty anyway, might as well take out as many of them as I can."
Headline tomorrow: Trump orders FCC to settle case against himself for $420 trillion dollars
Is it blind alignment with Luigi to say that he's innocent until proven guilty, a right afforded to him by the Fifth Amendment?
That his guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
That the case against him is circumstantial at best?
Anything against Trump is seen as political to these people. She knows she is going against the narrative and knows people are going to give her shit for it.
She needs to start an OnlyGrans
The sad state of our laws are such that they could set up a S-Corp or C-Corp and act in official capacity of that corporation literally get away with murder.
Generally speaking, it's casting people. I've been listening to a shit ton of film production podcasts and the universal thread across the good shows is excellent casting directors.
You need great writers of course, so after a while the two go hand in hand.
I don't get how Eric Cook can take this quid pro quo.
My limited understanding of the law is that jeopardy attaches once a jury is empaneled. So, if the case is dismissed, prosecutors can recharge him, which I imagine is exactly why Trump wants to do it this way.
Trump could just issue a pardon and make the case moot.
JFC the fact that criminals can't even crime properly.....
I've lost count the number of times I've taken on a project because something was annoying me.
STOP GOING TO REDDIT!
Jesus fucking Christ....