CooperRedArmyDog

... You are aware of what happens when you explode bombs in civilian heavy areas. You are also aware that is a war crime right?

also Lebinon is not at war so none of there citizens are valid targets

its pretty settled actialy, its the worker ownership of the means of production

OSHA, as much as I love it is not even close to Socialism, its enabling act requries it to consider the effects of profit before any rule comes into place. The citiations are far too low to mean anything, and almost always the too low fines are negotiated down, or vacated intirely.

OSHA is a worker protection but it exests as part of capitalism

I can tell you from personal experence that Trans/LGBT bubbles as you call it, are incredably liberal and very rarely communist, Second have you considered why they are desperate, or was that enough for you to dismiss them. Third... do you know what Communism is? fourth, do you mean "here too" as you almost became a communist, or where you live almost did fifth, please learn what communism is, and also understand why there are spaces like the LGBT spaces,

How are you "Providing a service" the house is there regardless of you, you do not do anything more than Incidental labor to the shelter (if you do that) and administrative labor that is reductive given it only exists due to your involvement.

what you are actualy doing is preventing the housing from being avalible to those who need it, your tennents, are the ones who need housing and it should be owned by them. Landlording is paricitic in its nature.

Now I am not saying you are a bad person, you are just playing the game. However we need to understand that this game is an immoral game.

Their stratagy has always been scream about being the only game intown that is not farther right then them ... at some point that has to break down

We could expect Harris to denoucne the endorsements and tell them to F-off instead of reveling in the ensorsements, that would be a start

I mean odd that you KNOW none of these people where going to vote for Harris but these endorsments will get people to vote for Harris from the trump camp. I mean I would argue that there are people who remember past political actions and do not want to suport someone also suported by ghools, and this was either the last straw, or enough that they felt there was some alterer motive here.

Second, have you seen any trump suporter, or someone thinking about suporting trump they are unlikely to be pulled away.

third, threat to democracy? I mean I hate to break it to you but at best the US is an Oligopoly, and even then I would argue the dems are just a few steps behind. As for the the SCOTUS, what is stopping biden from using the above the law power... or Haris, why is this only a concern when trump might use it

fourth, you have to relise that DICK CHENEY endorsing your canidate is not going to be a good look, especialy reveling in it. the better political move would be to use his endorsement to open up a conversation about all the evil he did, and the farther promotion of the Unitary Executive (Really started by Reagon and his staffers... who also endorsed harris) leading us into the mess we are in today, and to shove that endorsement where the sun dont shine

Kyive independent is not credable nor is it remotly objective, it is a mouth pice of the Ukranian government

both sides are Fasistic, and engage in class colaberation. If I look at the endorsements for haris coming from the right, there are people I would not want to even agree on what pizza topping is best with, let alone who should run a country.

Second your right, anyone can, however the canidates can also reject their endorsement, and tell them to shove it where the sun don't shine, they have not done that, and that is damning.

3rd ... REAGON AND CHENEY ARE MODERATE NOW... do you not see how abserd you are talking? they are not moderates

No one said that. maybe they should have been crtitical of her not disavoying it

no one is saying that is, but what queermunist is doing that you are failing to do is annilise the bias of the source, and consider the reasons for why they wrote something and the way they wrote it ... this is basic media literacy