"Name two social housing projects built by the Democrats in the past ten years."- A lemmygrad user who replied to you but you cannot see.
CooperRedArmyDog
joined 3 years ago
Communist, Socialist, on the right side of history, feel free to take you pick from the 3
you expect liberals or anarchists to have read the ENTIRE PAMPHLET, if they did that how would they be able to blindly call us athoritarian, with no real understanding of the word.
Hey, would you mind telling me how many homeless people there are in, Sweden raw number or pecentage of population your choice. When we are done, I will post Cuba's rate and we can compare
hey given you replied to someone from beehaw and they cannot see you, do you mind if I repost this for you? I think this perfectly illistrates a point.
Fun fact Cuba is currently the best for LGBT rights, and the reunification of Germany dragged east germany decades back in LGBT progress... just some food for thought
Question, you mention that the only instances you block allow fascism, however you have blocked both Lemmygrad and preemptively Hexbear, both of them are Communist in nature, and I feel that this is crazy to need to point out, but communism is the polar opposite to Fascism, and they are ideological opposed in every way, You will never find a more ardent anti-facist than a communist, so I feel like this is a bad faith attack on these instances. I also would like to point out that First Hexbear has not federated, nor made any plans to federate with Beehaw, over concerns with Beehaw moderation, and Lemmygrad has Rule 2. No Bigotry Rule 3. be Respectful and Rule 5. No Right Deviationists (No fascists), and they are very well enforced, and Rule 3 in particular is better enforced there than over here on Beehaw.
No its sillier than that, its because they didn't want to see communist in lemmy.ml
https://web.archive.org/web/20220310045805/https://beehaw.org/ Sealioning is asking for evidence btw... if you did not know the lingo
You should have seen Beehaws earlier rule set, there was a rule aganst asking for sources
So how Lemmygrad does their bans are that if the instance has had issues with spamming them in the past they will block, as far as I can tell if the issue has been solved a simple message will get them off the block list
I am not 100% sure where you are going with this, however I am going to say I agree that the move by beehaw is a blatent move to exert control on other instances, and it was never in question, in my mind atleast that it was their goal from my reading of their first post. I however disagree that they pose a threat to the other istances, they pose a threat if instances give in, like it apears sh.itjust.works may have done given their new post. Beehaw, sense the begining has been going arround acting like they have quite a bit like they are the arbitor, and everyone else should join them. I for one think the other instances of Lemmy should band together and let Beehaw wall themselves off. I do not think they would sucseed in this goal, and they would either give up on their imperialistic conquest or they would die a death of isolation.