Communist

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

Is there any chance you're a chimera?

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The funny dramatically outweighs the annoying for me honestly, it's not like this kind of advertising is more annoying than ads used to be

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the most fun hype cycle I have experienced in my life

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Peak human shape is obviously the largest shape, you will always be the worlds fattest man.

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be careful, that's God Emperor Communist now. This is a warning.

(/s)

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

N.G.R. also sounds racist...

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In that instance, the claim is "There is evidence of X problem"

They then provided the evidence of that problem and were ignored, the burden of proof was on the person making the claim that there was a problem, and there was a problem, they provided proof, and were ignored.

This has nothing in common with the previous scenario.

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Is this a headline from 200 years ago??

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's making a positive claim about a negative outcome. "There is enough evidence to be confident there aren't structural problems" is what they're really saying.

This doesn't work for god because there's nothing to check, there's never been any evidence for god, but there's been plenty of evidence for structural issues existing.

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The second one is wrong, there is no god is not a claim that requires evidence in the same way there are no fairies in my fridge doesn't require evidence

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

...Do you not realize that the same goes for god?

[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This guy eats babies

prove me wrong

view more: ‹ prev next ›