CoderKat

Even without knowing what the number would be, there's some interesting nuance to this. Eg, a lot of guns used in crimes would be taken from family members or parents bought for their kids as a straw purchase, but from the perspective of the gun sale itself, it was a legal sale (even though the user of the gun didn't legally acquire it). I call that particular example out because it's been prominent in some school shootings, won't be fixed by just limiting the purchase of guns, but is still something that only exists because of US gun culture.

There's also the fact that a massive amount of gun crime is gang violence, where it's more likely that the guns are illegally owned. This is still a tragedy and nobody should be dying to gun violence whether or not they're in a gang. But unless innocent people are victims (which also is often the case!), gang violence isn't usually what people are thinking of or focusing on, since many people's concern is somewhat understandably focused on more random gun violence, where it's harder to understand why it's happening.

Ugh, I basically never watched any show that closely before DVDs. Mind you, I was also pretty young at the time, but that worked even more against me as it was much less of an option to record anything when it was entirely on my parents' devices. Plus only one TV had satellite and my dad basically monopolized it.

I basically only watched things sporadically, as I was able to. Which also meant story heavy serials weren't viable. Everything had to be at least decently episodic so that I wouldn't feel lost due to missing half the episodes and watching reruns out of order.

I'm genuinely glad kids these days have it so much better. How many times as a kid did I beg my parents to let me watch some popular kids show and it wasn't an option? And if I ever did get to see something I liked, it could be months before the stars aligned to get to see another episode.

K3s? What did you do to the other 5 letters??

In theory, the delivery charge should have been the money that goes to Uber to cover their costs. It's expensive to develop quality web apps, manage drivers, do customer support, etc. But in practice, Uber double dips. There's the delivery fee and restaurant paid fees (often resulting in higher menu prices).

Yeah. I don't understand it even in context.

"This shooting was racially motivated, and he hated Black people," the sheriff said at a news conference. "He wanted to kill n------. "That's the one and only time I'll use that word," Waters said, referring to the racial slur.

Like, what??? Why use it even that "one and only" time?

I somehow never even realized that was Tom Cruise until today...

As someone with a hearing impairment, robot phone menus are the absolute worst. Sometimes I just can't understand what the options are and unlike a human, robots can't rephrase or enunciate differently. I will literally go out of my way to not do business with some companies based solely on whether or not I can do everything online.

I bet a good number of those people are the ones who get lots of vacation time already and are just pulling others down because they want to be treated better than average. It's like how there's people who oppose raising min wage because "they don't want burger flippers to make the same pay as they do". Crabs in a bucket mentality.

There's a lot of Americans who sadly think that way. We see it with the student loan forgiveness efforts, too. They can't be happy with others getting nice things unless they themselves are still somehow getting better things. To not mince words, they lack empathy and are selfish.

The speed bumps are supposed to be tailored to the target speed. There's some 40 km/h streets in my city with regular speed bumps and they're perfectly fine because the speed bumps are designed for that speed. They're quite shallow compared to the kind of speed bump you'd see in a 20 km/h parking lot.

Yeah, the government controls your health care whether or not they're actually running the hospitals.

Plus, the GOP loves statements like that because they actively sabotage the government. While far from perfect, plenty of countries are capable of adequately running public health care systems, along with plenty of other government programs (roads, prisons, education, national defense, etc). The GOP's whole strategy is to purposefully break systems and then point at the broken system and claim that this is why we need to privatize it. Government run programs are just as good as the government as a whole, and the GOP are poisoning the US government.

How much do people contribute to Terraform itself as opposed to a Terraform provider, I wonder? I'm biased because I've personally contributed to providers (and not Terraform itself), but I perceive providers to really be the meat of the product. For the most part, Terraform largely is just a framework for reconciling resources, but most actual functionality is in those resources themselves, for which all functionality is provided by the provider. e.g., if I wanna make a load balancer and a bunch of VMs, Terraform provides the glue that loads providers and can specify the dependency of the VMs on the LB, but the whole creating of the VMs and LB as well as the diffing and updating are all in the provider.

That's not to excuse what HashiCorp did, but just I suspect a lot of what people view as "Terraform" isn't actually the part that HashiCorp controls.

Man, I utterly detest Musk and think he's dumb as bricks, but blaming Musk for this feels like a big stretch. Not, you know, Tencent or the CCP?