CoderKat

I agree they can be useful (I've found intelligent code snippet autocompletion to be great), but it's really important that the humans using the tool are very skilled and aware of the limitations of AI.

Eg, my usage generates only very, very small amounts of code (usually a few lines). I have to very carefully read those lines to make sure they are correct. It's never generating something innovative. It simply guesses what I was going to type anyways. So it only saved me time spent typing and the AI is by no means in charge of logic. It also is wrong a lot of the time. Anyone who lets AI generate a substantial amount of code or lets it generate code you don't understand thoroughly is both a fool and a danger.

It does save me time, especially on boilerplate and common constructs, but it's certainly not revolutionary and it's far too inaccurate to do the kinds of things non programmers tend to think AI can do.

He was kicked out of EA. Even EA isn't this bad lol. Seriously, while EA has had some controversies with nickle and diming, have they ever retroactively started making things cost money?

Arbitration is often a good thing, by avoiding clogging up courts and arbitrators can sometimes be better than whatever judge you'd get (since both parties have to agree to the arbitrator). It's still legally binding and arbitrators have made lots of great rulings.

But not as a replacement for class action. The whole point of class actions is to make it much more viable for many people to be represented because only one affected person has to deal with managing an expensive lawsuit and there's just one case instead of hundreds of thousands of arbitration cases (which still cost a ton of money for lawyers). So IMO arbitration is great, but shouldn't be allowed to replace class actions specifically.

Migrating really large software is incredibly time consuming and difficult. My background is with backend servers, not games, but some large framework migrations we've done were a multi year effort and IMO they weren't nearly as big or fundamental as game engines can be (though we did have to maintain near perfect uptime, which isn't a concern for an unreleased game).

I'm no expert on the US Constitution, but I was under the impression that the second amendment basically lets you have guns (well, something something well regulated militia, but that part is universally ignored by now). It doesn't say you're allowed to carry in public. I know states already get to set carry laws, which is why some states are open vs concealed carry. I don't see how this is much different. It's not like they're even saying you can't have guns at your home.

I mean, some of them? Plenty of people who shoot others are first offenders. And I'm sure even many dangerous people wouldn't carry a gun around if the mere act of carrying could get you sent to jail. Carrying being legal means that you can blend into the crowd of law abiding people.

Nobody thinks every gun crime will be stopped with any single act of gun control. But they all reduce it.

I don't think it's quite an equivalence. When carrying firearms is illegal (as it effectively is in my country of Canada), you know whenever you see someone with a gun that you should run and call the police. You know they're up to no good. In many US states, if you see someone with a gun... you kinda just have to deal with it. Maybe they'll shoot you. Maybe they just need to overcompensate for something. You can't really run from it because it can be so common.

A decent amount of gun crime is also spur of the moment acts. They won't go home, get their gun, and come back. The gun violence only happens because the perpetrator happened to have a gun when they were angry. Banning carrying doesn't guarantee people won't be armed in public, but it sure will heavily reduce it.

Jeez, that's even worse than I was expecting. I was expecting an unlabeled lever somewhere, but this isn't just unlabeled, but also looks like it isn't even obviously a lever!

I mean, the article does say they had never used an EV and rented a gas car but got given the Tesla anyway. I don't think that's a basic knowledge thing. They weren't trying to drive something that they were unfamiliar with. Why would they know how the charging works?

There hasn't been much of a reason for someone who doesn't drive an EV to know about charging, which is very different from filling up a car with gas. And heck, every gasoline car uses the same gas nozzle, which isn't the case for Teslas. Plus gas stations are never more than a stone's throw away, which is more than can be said about EV chargers (let alone Tesla compatible ones).

You definitely don't need accounts for every instances (as long as you're not defederated). That sounds like an app bug or something.

Do you have something filtering out downvoted comments? Cause it appears to me that there would have been two comments not deeply in the negative when you posted. The other top level comments have 50+ downvotes and every other comment is a reply to them.

Hi, I make six figures and I'm very happy to see this (and also downvoted you for spreading this kinda division). Most half decent people are happy for others getting good things, not upset because they get something better or because it means you're not as much better than them anymore.

We absolutely should also help home prices to be affordable. The current prices in many cities are completely unmaintainable for far too many people. Everyone needs housing, so it's dumb for us to keep cropping the price of it up.