US: Bashes Canada for no reason. Starts a trade war.
Canada: Makes new trade partners.
US: Canada how dare you find other trade partners! Come back here so I can bash you again!
CircaV
joined 6 months ago
That’s all fine or whatever. But fuck you U of T for finding the money for lifelong positions these people whereas U of T would have never created the same positions for Canadian scholars. Same thing happened back in the day of the Vietnam War and the Kent State shooting - all my profs when I did my undergrad were draft dodgers from Vietnam and/or left the US after they shot and killed students at Kent State. Now today we’re getting even more US ideology infiltrating our country because the US voted in a fascist.
I know. But I’m also not falling into the same trap the Americans did, ie. staying home on voting day and letting a fascist in to power.
I saw him live at an earlier event. He’s a fantastic speaker. 🔥🔥🔥wish he was NDP leader. He’s the left populist Canada needs.
This is supposed to be a shitpost sub, what’s with the objective reality???
Greenland should absolutely deny these invaders entry.
I could give two shits if Joe Rogaine doesn’t want to come here. We don’t want him here. Go gargle Putin’s knob.
What can AB feasibly do about Marlaina right now though?
I’ll have faith in AB again if you guys vote in Nenshi next time.
How do you explain Danielle Smith then? I know the citites go NDP but most of AB is conservative.
If reporting the Smith screed, you can also include these details in your complaint.
It may also be reportable to the RCMP as potential violation of Canadian Criminal Code, Section 122 Breach of public trust.
Proving breach of public trust under s. 122 should include:
[1] ☐ identity of accused as culprit
☐ date and time of the incident
☐ jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
☐ the accused was an « official » (holds « office » or is « appointed or elected to discharge a public duty »);
☐ the accused was acting in connection with the duties of his or her office;
☐ the accused’s conduct represented a serious and marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused’s position of public trust; and
☐ the accused acted with the intention to use his or her public office for a purpose other than the public good, for example, for a dishonest, partial, corrupt, or oppressive purpose.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-122.html
https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Breach_of_Public_Trust_(Offence)
🇨🇦🤝🇪🇺
🖕🇺🇸🖕