Chronicon

joined 1 year ago
[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

just untraditional

It is tasty (though it's easy to accidentally use too much and turn it from soup to one big mush)

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

nah even natopedia doesn't attempt to draw this strong of a distinction. They're composed of the same people (give or take casualties and new recruits), they are the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Brigade

They were folded into the official armed forces as a special operations battalion all the way back in 2014 (and even before that they were sanctioned by the interior department for a while). So all this guy is claiming is "we didn't give them guns before 2014", really.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if you're a disgusting heathen peanut butter is also good

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

first one had shatterproof glass I guess?

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

yeah

the internet was not designed for NAT, and it was not designed for ICMP to be disabled lol

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's one of those things where, maybe practically its unlikely to be used against you, but especially in a context like this site it seems undeniably bad to have our social networks mapped and (for those who are logged in at least) connected back to our real accounts, or at least browser fingerprints, in this way.

The way many of them work is when you click the "Share" button to grab a link to share, it creates a unique identifier tied to your account and tacks it onto the link. Then when others click it, they can get a picture of how the link spread, despite the dissemination of the link happening off site. Maybe one share generated 10,000 clicks and others might only get 1 or 2. Its likely mostly being used for marketing but there's nothing to say if it becomes useful it couldn't be pulled by law enforcement too to help map groups.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

well you can rule out DNS issues by making sure it resolves properly using command line tools like dig. traceroute is hard to use on a lot of modern networks but a simple ping is still usable, or something like netcat or curl to rule out browser shenanigans

I have actually had some weird issues like this too, where I seemingly couldn't reach hexbear from my former VPN provider at one point, but it eventually recovered, so maybe bad peering/blocking due to abuse going on from either the VPS provider or the VPN provider? But it was very annoying to troubleshoot and not that big of a deal so I don't think I ever found a smoking gun

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

2 days says to me not DNS propagation

https://protonvpn.com/features/adblocker could be this or another one of Proton's "protection" features (okay scare quotes is a little harsh but I kinda start to roll my eyes with that type of stuff)

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this made me want to try mackerel in tomato, hate when advertising works

there's at least one norwegian store near me with it...

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah surprisingly seems to be true. I've bought a SIM with cash before. They do ask for your full name and address at the very least but its conceivably possible to do with a fake name and address and topping it up with cash every so often.

But almost nobody does that, and it doesn't really change the point of the OP since if you ever use the sim for identifiable comms or in identifiable locations or sign into other services in your name using it.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

there was lemmygrad and hexbear but hex wasn't fed'ed

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yiffy is iffy? you don't say

view more: ‹ prev next ›