Chrobin

joined 2 years ago
[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know. But generally, the gender of the noun describing a person correlates with the gender of the person described strongly.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Well, you're arguing terminology. But the original commenter's point was about the association of grammatical gender with gender, and that is definitely a thing in German.

Der Arzt (Male doctor) -> die Ärztin (female doctor) is an example where the grammatical gender changes with the gender of the person, and that's almost always the case.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Well, as a German, I wouldn't agree. Generally, nouns describing men are masculine and nouns describing women are feminine. "Das Mädchen" is just an odd one out because it's the diminutive (always neuter in German) of "die Maid", which in turn is feminine.

Yes, this doesn't really apply to objects, but it mostly does for people.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pretty sure a court told them to.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago (12 children)

No, their point is about people thinking all people of a group have a characteristic because some of them do.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not trying to argue approximations. Physics is just approximations all the way down. But as a physicist, I also love arguing about technicalities, and that's also kinda the point of science communities for me.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Populism is basically about simple solutions for complicated problems, and blaming every problem on a certain group of people.

From the right, the most prominent example is immigrants, while from the left, it's mostly rich people.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But the point of general relativity is that a free-floating observer is equivalent to an observer in free space. That means that falling due to gravity, which you call a force, is an unaccelerated movement, i.e. no force.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

In our current understanding of physics, it's an effect from the curvature of space and not a force. Quantizing gravity results in unphysical divergences. Whether there will be a way to model gravity as an exchange of particles, we can't know for sure. So according to our current knowledge, it's not a force.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Well, firstly, we can quantize gravity pretty easily, it just has unphysical divergences.

But secondly, I think it makes most sense to talk about the current accepted physics because we don't know how quantum gravity will work.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Gravity isn't a force tho...

view more: ‹ prev next ›