Ah yes, the amazing work that taught the world that though you may take trips around the universe, do not ask questions you do not want to know the answer to.
Chefdano3
This work revolutionized art for generations. It was instrumental in changing the way people imagined badgers, mushrooms, and snakes. Many modern works of art's influence can be traced back to this monumental piece.
Blood Benchy Boat.
It is incredibly wild. That show was awesome.
I was thinking more like Psycho Pass. The AI is its own entity, living in reality, doing the AI things that it was made to do, it's just its processing power is a bunch of human brains linked together.
I'm being increasingly convinced that when we do develop true AI, it'll actually be just a massive array of interconnected human brains in a secret facility somewhere.
I found it deep within the bottom of my recently viewed webtoons.
"the day to day life of the world's strongest guild receptionist"
No wonder I didn't remember the title. Who the hell would?
Wait, I vaguely remember this series. I can't remember the name but this panel is very familiar
"Long COVID won't cost us billions if we don't have to treat them."
- Trump (probably)
And we'll soon learn she fell out a window.
The browser was sold to Chinese investors though.
~~This makes sense. And I can see how to apply when you add more dice with different probability.~~
... however, when I did that math, I ended up with 87.04%
1-((1-.64) x (1-.4) x (1-.4)) = x
1-(.36 x .6 x .6) = x
1-.1296 = .8704
87.04% chance to get 2 winning dice
Hold up. Something seems off with this.
I tried calculating the probability of landing 2 losing side by using the same method and it doesn't add up
.2 x .2 = .04
.2 x .5 = .1
.2 x .5 = .1
1-((1-.04) x (1-.1) x (1-.1) = x
1-(.96 x .9 x .9) = x
1-.7776 = .2224
22.24% chance to have 2 losing dice.
But 87.04+22.24 = 109.28%
You would think that adding the winning combinations to the losing combinations would be 100%
What am I missing