Chefdano3

joined 2 years ago
[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

~~This makes sense. And I can see how to apply when you add more dice with different probability.~~

... however, when I did that math, I ended up with 87.04%

1-((1-.64) x (1-.4) x (1-.4)) = x

1-(.36 x .6 x .6) = x

1-.1296 = .8704

87.04% chance to get 2 winning dice

Hold up. Something seems off with this.

I tried calculating the probability of landing 2 losing side by using the same method and it doesn't add up

.2 x .2 = .04

.2 x .5 = .1

.2 x .5 = .1

1-((1-.04) x (1-.1) x (1-.1) = x

1-(.96 x .9 x .9) = x

1-.7776 = .2224

22.24% chance to have 2 losing dice.

But 87.04+22.24 = 109.28%

You would think that adding the winning combinations to the losing combinations would be 100%

What am I missing

 

I can't seem to wrap my head around how to calculate this, nor the reasoning behind it.

Say you have 3 10-sided dice. 2 dice have 8 "winning" faces and 2 "losing" faces. So an 80% chance of winning. The third dice has 5 "winning" and 5 "losing" sides, so a 50% chance of winning.

If you roll all three of these dice at the same time:

-What is the probability of at least 1 dice winning.

-What is the probability of at least 2 dice winning.

-What is the probability of all 3 winning.

From what I've seen I can calculate the probability of all 3 winning by doing:

0.8 x 0.8 x 0.5=0.32

A 32% chance of all 3 winning at the same time.

But what about the others, I can't seem to figure it out.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, the amazing work that taught the world that though you may take trips around the universe, do not ask questions you do not want to know the answer to.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This work revolutionized art for generations. It was instrumental in changing the way people imagined badgers, mushrooms, and snakes. Many modern works of art's influence can be traced back to this monumental piece.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Blood Benchy Boat.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

It is incredibly wild. That show was awesome.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I was thinking more like Psycho Pass. The AI is its own entity, living in reality, doing the AI things that it was made to do, it's just its processing power is a bunch of human brains linked together.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

I'm being increasingly convinced that when we do develop true AI, it'll actually be just a massive array of interconnected human brains in a secret facility somewhere.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I found it deep within the bottom of my recently viewed webtoons.

"the day to day life of the world's strongest guild receptionist"

No wonder I didn't remember the title. Who the hell would?

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Wait, I vaguely remember this series. I can't remember the name but this panel is very familiar

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Long COVID won't cost us billions if we don't have to treat them."

  • Trump (probably)
[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And we'll soon learn she fell out a window.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

The browser was sold to Chinese investors though.

 

zombo.com was launched in 1999. I remember in high school you'd see the new fancy web kiosk's the school put up just displaying it as a joke. and being locked out of the address bar so you couldn't change it. The fact that this url has been renewed, maintained, and updated with all the advancements web browsers have made in the last 24 years, just to have this useless site still exist amuses me to no end.

view more: next ›