is making a killing
some might say thats their business model
CarmineCatboy2
joined 2 years ago
and to be fair, its not like kamala is part of the british royal family
That's assuming the economic arrangement during and post climate change is conductive to rising birth rates in the first place.
What people, especially on the right, don't realize is that falling birth rates is not a matter of incentive or culture. It's correlated with rising literacy rates. That's it. The moment people realize the costs of raising a child in an industrial society and how that affects their future livelihoods they simply don't. The reason birth rates were high in pre industrial societies is because having lots of children was the economic strategy of every living human - from peasants to landlords to kings and merchants. The reason we had exploding growth rates during the industrializing period is because literacy rates and standards of living actually went down in many places, and didn't catch up to the industrial reality until much later. Now, having a child is a luxury for the gentry few. Therefore, populations de-grow.
you must verify your income to date
hey i wonder why people won't have kids
sergent at arms arrests him and ships him to hague
the parliamentarian of course
i'm under the impression that 75k USD annually is actually a not great salary in most urban areas of the US
so there's the connection right there
When I hear european officials talk about over-reliance on Russian oil my brain immediately corrects it to 'British over-reliance on taxing the shit out of India'. They bought cheap commodities from Russia and sold them overpriced luxury goods, as well as manufactured goods. It was a textbook center-periphery relationship and they threw it all out because they are that loyal to their american overlord. And now they whine about how over-reliant they were on Russia and China.
While Azerbaijan is no longer a member of the CSTO, it's important to note that Nagorno-Karabakh was formally Azeri territory, and that it was made possible by a previous ethnic cleansing as well. That might explain why Armenia didn't trigger the defense pact. They weren't even an occupying power, but the sponsor of a local autonomous government.
If anything my impression from Pashinyan's acts since then seem to veer between 'maybe we can flirt with the EU/NATO' and 'maybe we should just wash our hands of this cause, keep our friendship with Iran and become a transit corridor'.
I think we can all agree that the funniest thing about the Trump Trial is that he was basically convicted for being bad at corruption.
Why the hell did he use campaign funds for hush money lmfao.
For what it's worth, I suppose it places the Rafah massacres on the spotlight. Sure, the dozens of preceding massacres are good evidence for South Africa. But now Israel has to defend itself not only from the suit in general, but from the fact that they went against an ICJ order. Hence the genocidal PM bothering to claim Rafah was a mistake after months of claiming they'll do it. They might be spooked-ish.
They were also high on end of history histrionics and genuinely believed that economic prosperity would lead to an american style free market economy. And I don't think people were silly to think that way in the 90s. You had to be in the know to realize the fundamentals at play. That China, unlike the Soviets, did not privatize the commons but instead implemented a market economy. The only hint of how things were going was how Japan was forcefully turned into an american sharemarket economy. China by all indications did not have to and didn't.