Spore pear spotted.
I'd argue it depends a lot on exactly how the AI is used. Just putting in a text prompt and accepting the output with minimal or no edits doesn't seem much different from essentially commissioning the computer to make something for you, but I've also seen some people use some of the AI tools for modifying images (like the ones that "expand" them by generating stuff the AI thinks fits around the edge, or that let one add something into a selected area or fill an area in based on what's around it) a great many times over to shift an image towards a desired result in a way that at least from timelapse looked like it would require some time and familiarity with the tools. A bit like how asking someone to take a photo for you doesn't make you an artist, but selecting a bunch of photos you didn't take and using them to make a collage or something arguably might.
Honestly I suspect that once this whole AI bubble dies down, there will be a shift in generative AI from just trying to make it create art entirely on it's own towards finding ways for humans to make art out of whatever becomes of the tech, partly because artists are nothing if not creative, and partly because in addition to just knowing the muscle memory and physical mechanics of making art, an artist is also going to have a sense of what does and doesn't look good that develops as they learn, and can try to shape an idea to fit, while the machine might just give you whatever it calculates fits the prompt even if following the prompt won't look very good without some tweaking.
I really ought to cause my work has me getting up super early in the morning, but rarely does my brain actually let me fall asleep till like 11
Learning to do it yourself can give you a bit of a hobby at least. Can be fun, or at least relaxing.
Isn't that the point of tests? Do something at a more limited scale to see what the results of that are?
Probably because they didnt go throught the government, which takes a long time to move on anything, and just put pressure on some profit seeking corporations that just want to get a bother to go away, but which also unfortunately have been put in a position of practical power equal to some types of legislation.
Unless of course, one were to live a part of the world where the Tokay gecko can commonly be found.
Furries have hated the whole "legal adult business made difficult or randomly disrupted because the payment processor companies decided they dont like you" thing for quite some time now. Ive seen multiple artists I follow in that space make multiple switches of platforms because of it and plenty more complain about them. Tho its usually been paypal that gets complained about there from what Ive seen.
Romance. Like I get on an intellectual level why people couple up and all, evolution and all that, and that people strongly desire it, but Ive never been able to imagine exactly what it feels like to want that close of a relationship with someone, let alone a formalized and exclusive one.
I think the reasoning is something like this: these companies employ such call center employees for a reason, either they legally have to for one reason or another or they've determined that in some way, it is more profitable to have the capacity for people to call them than not. If the call centers are swamped, then they still cost the company money, but their benefit to the company is reduced, because the "real" calls can't get through in a timely fashion. As such, it's in the company's interest to avoid having people spam them, and if the policy those people want changed won't really cost the company anything to change, then just doing that might be the most profitable option for them.
I wonder how long it will be before someone starts believing that aliens built the Bass Pro Shop Pyramid in Memphis.