CanadaPlus

joined 2 years ago
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 3 points 2 years ago

The problem is, once the country is out of the EU’s protection, daddy Russia will be happy to raise him an alcoholic, racist scumbag.

Oh no, Hungary could do so much damage on their own! /s

And honestly, it's a question how long Putinism is even going to survive. If the West can keep it's shit together the answer is not very long.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 5 points 2 years ago

The OG white Middle Eastern country.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 8 points 2 years ago

Mmm, race conditions, just like mama used to make.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It's not environment-killing either, at least as far as growing wheat and tomatoes is concerned. Environment-damaging, sure, but we could potentially starve a lot of people and keep going (though we shouldn't!), and it's not even clear agricultural output will go down rather than just relocating.

Don't get me wrong, I like having wild animals besides rats and flies, and I don't love the idea of a giant global mass-migration crisis as Bangladesh sinks into the sea and we fight over farmland in what used to be an icecap, so I still think we need to crack down on fossil fuels a lot harder. We're pretty adaptable, though, and some sad little human world will exist on the other side if that's all.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Actually, I'd say it made them a country, back before they lost all their territory.

I'm not sure what the exact term we use has to do with the fate of socialist systems anyway, so I won't reduce myself to arguing about it. If you don't have anything else, I think we're done here.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 2 points 2 years ago

Not particularly related, but neat. I learned some things.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I guess the crisis itself could be and was, but at the time nobody was really talking about the concept of a cold war, and the nuclear threat stayed heightened for decades. Actually, opinions vary on how long a nuclear-power conflict can reliably stay cold, even now.

AI and nuclear war seem like the main direct threats right now. Climate change will suck and I'll miss coral reefs, but it's not planet killing unless it sets something else more deliberate off. The world looks unstable, but I'm not expecting WWIII this year, and AI isn't going to be very dangerous by 2025 either. The Cuban missile crisis should have ended the world as we know it in the span of a few months. We basically just won a few coin flips in a row; I bet other parallel universes weren't so lucky.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

It broke in the 90's. History was "over" so they kind of adjusted the scale, and now that shit's real again they keep having to shave off tiny increments closer and closer to midnight.

We're still way better off than during the Cuban missile crisis, imminent existential risk-wise.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From the perspective of the people who make the crap, corporations are the users.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 2 points 2 years ago

New Guam, maybe.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess that makes sense, if you understand nothing about how any of the underlying technologies work.

Soon after launching, however, the company’s law enforcement clients started asking about the viability of running phenotype-generated faces through facial recognition tools. “We were surprised when we heard this,” Greytak says. “It’s just not the intended purpose of the composite images.”

... And I guess that makes sense if you know nothing about how people other than your colleagues work. Seriously, how did they not see that coming?

In another infamous example that Garvie cites in her report, a detective from the NYPD’s Facial Identification Section, after noting that a suspect looked like the actor Woody Harrelson, put a photo of the actor through the department’s facial recognition tool.

Actually, that just doesn't make sense, haha.

For anyone reading and confused, this face rendering thing probably barely works, and definitely isn't going to be accurate in just the right way to complement a blackbox face recogniser trained on actual photos. Before you even get close to "is it too powerful" questions about privacy and abuse, "does it work at all" has to be considered.

view more: ‹ prev next ›