classic. That's how libs "fight" fascism
BurgerPunk
joined 3 years ago
It was also a temper tantrum that was talked about beforehand enough online that we all knew here they were going to go there throw a fit. Yet somehow no one else knew?
The libs want to call it a coup, but they didn't do anything to head it off, when people going there to have their tantrum talked about it online. Then the capitol police let them in and got medals for it later. Libs response to even this one isolated thing is so scatteredshot i can't even make sense of it.
"It was a coup, but yeah we'll do nothing and let Trump run again in 4 years - we're not AuThOrItArIaNs!" Libs are something else. They can't even stay consistent with their own lore lol
Libs got the outcome they wanted, therefore it was Fair and Democratic(tm)
Yes! Why do they do that?! It makes no sense
medieval times mentality expansion
So yeah probably in the top three.
Yeah, there's not a lot of competition for least bad president
Right exactly. You'd gave to leave out his pre-presidential career as a genocider to make that argument.
The bottom of the list is definitely a crowded field. No way Trump comes close to worst.
Least bad president is really just between Lincoln and FDR. Unless someone wants to make an arguement for William Henry Harrison for dropping dead a month after being elected
Completely. That's the best way to describe it
Its all
. They talk about debt traps, but thats what the US/IMF/World Bank do, not China