She names Trump's points explicitly, but doesn't go beyond "the best practices of this and that institution".
I can't say they're wrong, I expect a scientific institution to have some integrity to say the least. But either she's too lazy to look them up, or she's not quoting any for a different reason
The irony of the iron horse
Could just make a bad book title
Ye, I see that pretty often with people reposting news. It might just be worthwhile to do
Yep, and for cars most of the noise comes from the tires. A muffler won't help that
Literally the most efficient transport option out there :p
If only there was some sort of governing organization that's supposed to protect us from unfair labour practices and exploitation
Just going by this article I can't quite tell whether either party has good intentions. Except for that the writer here does not
Roll you own "platinum standard" and see if he buys it :p
Oh cool new battery tech! What's up with the nearly irrelevant title?
Windows 11 has the option to protect parts of your filesystem. You may want to enable that.
Why? Because otherwise, pretty much any app with the exception of those locked in a web browser can read anything in userspace on your pc. Which is basically everything unless you've taken extra steps.
That's been the norm for quite a while, and unlike android, microsoft is hesitant to ditch the old thing and add in a prompt "app x is asking for file permission (yes/no)" because they want old software to work with new things.
On for linux, you'll have to make an extra user, install acl support and pray it doesn't accidentally get written incorrectly by some random app. That is, if you get something like hexos for example. You can roll your own as well.
On mac, don't bother. Apple has been caught routinely lying about their security and just straight up not fixing major security flaws. Dump your stuff on an external drive and unplug it when you're done. That goes for their desktops and phones.
edit: inb4 "whats on your iphone stays on your iphone"
Good news! No more nazi-social for you!
Ye I expect so, I don't like the way this author just doesn't bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules.
Which is probably fine, but that's just lazy or she's not mentioning the difference for another reason