BobTheDestroyer

joined 1 year ago
[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Sorry to reference an old reddit post, but this reminds me of Today you, tomorrow me.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Hah, we had a TV with one of those when I was a little kid. I remember the TV would sometimes hear just the right tone from its own speaker and change the channel. The buttons on the remote did have a very satisfying click, though.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Chloramines are disinfectants used to treat drinking water. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water.

source

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Okay, but "that is entirely your fault, grandma" generates a lot more discussion than "yeah, but you were a participant in a system along with billions of others which hid its externalities until it was too late to do anything about them"

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago

So, Terry Bernadino?

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Currently playing MGSV on PC. I never got into the metal gear franchise because I wasn't willing to keep up with the play stations. But it's a surprisingly good game. A little fan-service here and there (cough, Quiet) but the gameplay is solid. I like how they tie achievements with in-game rewards, things like rescuing a certain prisoner unlocks a new type of weapon or something. It's a good motivation to complete all the optional parts of the missions. And the missions are replayable, which gives you plenty of opportunity to get the best ratings and rewards.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Nothing is ever 100% safe. Risk assessment is a big part of federal regulations. (See refs at JSTOR and NCBI) One of the key questions is what is the cost/benefit balance for a product. Kitchen knives are hazardous, but it's very hard to cook without them, so they balance heavier on the benefit side despite the risks. Radithor is all risk and no benefit, so it was an easy decision to ban it.

The point ContrarianTrail was making is that there is some risk in nearly everything. People have died as a result of garden tools, cars, house pets, shaving, buckets, toothpicks, baseball, etc. Here's a list. The part he left out is the cost/benefit analysis. I prefer pull cords on my blinds, and I find the new regulations annoying. But I guess some federal agency decided they aren't so useful that it's worth the risk to children. And it would be selfish to be all upset about it if it saves some child's life.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I played Satisfactory for a while. Got a little past oil extraction and power generation. I think I was doing it wrong, though. I only made one actual factory, like with a floor and such, and it was one of those little templates you can design and make several of. Most of the stuff I built was just scattered about the map with miners and constructors and smelters just laying about everywhere and conveyer belts connecting them. It felt disorganized and, well, unsatisfying. The transport tube (the futurama style one) was fun, but most of the rest of it just felt like work. That and the fact that there was no provided reason to do any of it caused me to just lose interest after a while. I think the Christmas gift construction tree, where the last item required like 10,000 gifts collected was kind of discouraging too.

What keeps you motivated to improve, rebuild, and progress in the game? And what am I missing?

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No offence taken. You're right. And one of the few things the two parties cooperate on is working to insure it never changes.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

We've been arguing about this in the US for my whole life, and I'm not young. At this point it should be obvious neither of the two faces of our government has any interest in doing anything more about guns than using the topic as a wedge to divide us and as a source of campaign funding. So you want to ban guns. Is that the hill you want your children to die on? How about instead of insisting that's the only way, we enact a solution that keeps kids alive and that both the red and blue team can agree on, like, say, mandatory armed guards (a paid job, not volunteers) at school entrances. Is it in conflict with our ideal vision of a peaceful society? Maybe, but it works. Other countries have done it and it stopped school shootings entirely.

[–] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Fix your deep psychological issues with shopping! It's the American way.

view more: ‹ prev next ›