BlushedPotatoPlayers

joined 2 years ago
[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago

Knowing the Germans there is a slight chance somebody going to court because it was advertised as 1.5€/kg, and winning

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago (8 children)

This, I remember that some 20 years ago when going to the Antarctica for a PhD seemed like a good idea, I found a job where they were looking for a plumber. The pay was insane at that time

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago

Yes, I just wrote about that above. It's just the difference in cost between the two. How many large space observatories were there altogether? In the order of dozens maybe?

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

I tried that as well, but for me it was like being 10 again: -you meet the bandits -I, the lvl1 player kill them all -OK -I just remembered my party had a necromancer, raise the corpses -sure thing -I march around with my undead army and murder everyone who is in my way -This game is about creativity and cooperation -Not today -OK

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yes, and we are already doing that, VLBI uses dozens of telescopes, each of them larger that we could sensibly launch to space

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

We could, but it's way more expensive. There was a ~10m dish added to space VLBI, but the ground stations are several times larger, up to a few 100m. And you need dish size for sensitivity: in interferometry the largest distance between two telescopes gives the size of the synthetic instrument, but the size of the individual dishes fills up the detector.

Also, if something breaks it's almost impossible to fix in space.

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Just to add, radio telescopes easily have diameters of several 10 to several 100 meters, you won't put that easily in space. And even if you do, maybe one, not tens of them. And these are often used in network as well for interferometry to have higher spatial resolution, so that would be gone as well.

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 62 points 10 months ago (5 children)

There was a related podcast recently somewhere, the idea was that evolutionary lungs come from guts, so maybe guts would still have some ability to absorb oxygen, which, turns out, they indeed do. This could have some practical uses e.g. in intensive care situations where the patient's lung is useless (extreme COVID), which could give a last resort breathing opportunity while the lungs heal to a usable condition. Furthermore it gives a shitton of opportunity for butt jokes

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Or too much. Exactly my thought

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

I checked it, it's not :)

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lots of astronomical objects have names, but somehow it's asteroids and maybe craters that really got the naming hype, there are hundreds of them named after scientists, poets, the discoverer's teacher, you name it. It's a nice custom.

Disclaimer: I might be slightly biased, as I proposed my wife with naming one of them (asteroid, I mean).

view more: ‹ prev next ›