BleakBluets

joined 2 years ago
[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I thought the nostrils were the eyes at first and it just looked like a goofy No-Face from Spirited Away.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

If they didn't meet their quotas they get cherry-bombed.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I enjoy A Link to the Past Randomizer, but primarily because it adds replayability to a game I'm already so familiar with. ALttPR becomes a puzzle of which chests/dungeons have the highest probability of containing progression items. Calculating that optimized routing in realtime while racing against a clock is fun. Also figuring out the best way to deal with a boss that you already know well, but now you have an unexpected equipment loadout is fun to me.

However. If I were to play a new game I didn't have any familiarity with and its item placement and/or map layout was procedurally generated, I don't think I would enjoy a first playthrough. I don't enjoy variety just for the sake of variety. The proc-gen would have to have some known parameters that allow me to strategize in how I approach it in order to not seem arbitrary. If I didn't enjoy the first playthrough of such a game, I might not be motivated to learn enough to enjoy future runs.

That's why I think I don't love Spelunky or Slay the Spire despite loving games that play similarly like Cave Story and Magic the Gathering respectively. I think I could love these games if I could reasonably plan ahead, but I feel those games have too much variance and the outcomes feel arbitrary as a result. Though that could just be my lack of dedication to understanding the bounds of the generated content.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's Sous Vide. You must have meant those large cars that replaced station wagons.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Saw this on my bird calendar last week. Would have been better if it was positioned next to the pair of "Great Tits" that were in another photo.

edit: In case the text is too small, the name is "Andean Cock-of-the-Rock"

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

If the concern is that the files would be out of order when displayed in a file browser, Windows File Explorer actually accounts for this by sorting the number parts of a file sequentially in the case of multiple files sharing the same prefix. E.g. "file_10.txt" will sort after "file_9.txt" and not in between "file_1.txt" and "file_2.txt" as you would expect from a naive alphabetical sorting.

I still use leading zeroes though. It looks a lot more pleasant when the file names are the same length.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

She must be lactose intolerant

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: I just now realized that the graphic is more privacy-focused rather than consumer-rights-focused. I don't know what privacy issues Steam has specifically, so its inclusion on this list may not be justified regardless of any anti-consumer practices.

I'm not ditching my 20yo steam account on behalf of this graphic

I think that's why they were included in this graphic. They provide DRM games that are vendor-locked to their platform. They require that you buy a game from them to download mods from the workshop, even if that game doesn't use a Steam-specific modding framework (Slay the Spire and Black Ops 3 for example). They tie that account to many services in order to make it difficult to leave their platform. Services such as: per-game community forums, friend lists with direct messaging and multiplayer integration, VAC anti-cheat, and achievement tracking.

I like Valve, they contribute a lot to open source. But be honest, if Epic Games did 1/10 of this, they would be accused of trying to build a walled garden like Apple.

It will be absolute hell if Steam ever gets enshitified. It would be better if these services could follow an interoperable and open standard or were run independently. Vendor-lock from "good" corporations is still anti consumer.

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tony Finch's Pro Skater

[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
[–] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Had a beard. He clean shaved a couple weeks ago.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/281237

(Feel free to remove this as off-topic, but this relates to the post about the r/Piracy poll regarding what content will be permitted upon reopening. The body of this post wouldn't get the same reach as a comment on that post.)

Ahoy hearties! Here what I be thinkin'. Reddit be chargin' tens of millions of doubloons for third-mates to access the API, aye? They be claimin' to deserve a share of the booty for providin' trainin' data for AI (and obviously to kill competition with third-mate apps to boot).

Methinks if yee MUST chatter with those landlubbers (such as for the purpose of recruitin' new mates or cussing out mutinous scabs), then yee ought to make any text data yee provide unappealing and unusable to potential AI-training-customers.

Paintings of (Sexy) Captain John Oliver will only sully the attention of the human users. But (pirate) coded language mayhaps be an obstruction for bots? For those who find pirate speak to be too much effort, an alternative be to speak "sdrawkcaB".

I can no longer cast my bottled messages to Reddit's shore, so any of you seadogs are free to pass it along.

 

(Feel free to remove this as off-topic, but this relates to the post about the r/Piracy poll regarding what content will be permitted upon reopening. The body of this post wouldn't get the same reach as a comment on that post.)

Ahoy hearties! Here what I be thinkin'. Reddit be chargin' tens of millions of doubloons for third-mates to access the API, aye? They be claimin' to deserve a share of the booty for providin' trainin' data for AI (and obviously to kill competition with third-mate apps to boot).

Methinks if yee MUST chatter with those landlubbers (such as for the purpose of recruitin' new mates or cussing out mutinous scabs), then yee ought to make any text data yee provide unappealing and unusable to potential AI-training-customers.

Paintings of (Sexy) Captain John Oliver will only sully the attention of the human users. But (pirate) coded language mayhaps be an obstruction for bots? For those who find pirate speak to be too much effort, an alternative be to speak "sdrawkcaB".

I can no longer cast my bottled messages to Reddit's shore, so any of you seadogs are free to pass it along.

view more: next ›